Port Alfred Pulp and Paper Corporation v. Langevin

Port Alfred Pulp and Paper Corporation v. Langevin

The Court held that the statutory phrase 'at the time of the accident' governs determination of principal support and disallows an arbitrary 12‑month rule; and that where employment is non‑continuous the annual wage for compensation purposes is calculated under s.9(3) by combining remuneration during the active period with the worker's earnings during the remainder of the year. Applying these rules, the deceased was the principal support and the award was properly calculated, so the appeal was dismissed.

Citation
[1931] SCR 1
Parties
Appellant/defendant: Port Alfred Pulp and Paper Corporation; Respondent/plaintiff: Dame M. L. Langevin
Court
Supreme Court of Canada
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
10 April 1930
Procedural Posture
Appeal Workmen's Compensation Act Claim / Final Judgment on Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs; judgment of the Court of King's Bench confirmed
Legal Topics
Principal Support, Computation of Yearly Wages, Time Period for Assessment, Continuous Vs Non Continuous Employment
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Port Alfred Pulp and Paper Corporation

Appellant/defendant

Dame M. L. Langevin

Respondent/plaintiff

Procedural Posture

Appeal Workmen's Compensation Act Claim / Final Judgment on Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada

  1. 1 Whether the deceased was the principal support of the ascendant at the time of the accident
  2. 2 Whether courts must use a fixed retrospective period (twelve months) to determine principal support
  3. 3 How to compute 'yearly wages' under s.4 in light of s.9 when employment is non-continuous

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that the statutory phrase 'at the time of the accident' governs determination of principal support and disallows an arbitrary 12‑month rule; and that where employment is non‑continuous the annual wage for compensation purposes is calculated under s.9(3) by combining remuneration during the active period with the worker's earnings during the remainder of the year. Applying these rules, the deceased was the principal support and the award was properly calculated, so the appeal was dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs; judgment of the Court of King's Bench confirmed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs
  • Judgment of the Court of King's Bench affirmed