Port Alfred Pulp and Paper Corporation v. Langevin
The Court held that the statutory phrase 'at the time of the accident' governs determination of principal support and disallows an arbitrary 12‑month rule; and that where employment is non‑continuous the annual wage for compensation purposes is calculated under s.9(3) by combining remuneration during the active period with the worker's earnings during the remainder of the year. Applying these rules, the deceased was the principal support and the award was properly calculated, so the appeal was dismissed.
- Citation
- [1931] SCR 1
- Parties
- Appellant/defendant: Port Alfred Pulp and Paper Corporation; Respondent/plaintiff: Dame M. L. Langevin
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 10 April 1930
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Workmen's Compensation Act Claim / Final Judgment on Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs; judgment of the Court of King's Bench confirmed
- Legal Topics
- Principal Support, Computation of Yearly Wages, Time Period for Assessment, Continuous Vs Non Continuous Employment
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Port Alfred Pulp and Paper Corporation
Appellant/defendant
Dame M. L. Langevin
Respondent/plaintiff
Procedural Posture
Appeal Workmen's Compensation Act Claim / Final Judgment on Appeal to Supreme Court of Canada
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the deceased was the principal support of the ascendant at the time of the accident
- 2 Whether courts must use a fixed retrospective period (twelve months) to determine principal support
- 3 How to compute 'yearly wages' under s.4 in light of s.9 when employment is non-continuous
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that the statutory phrase 'at the time of the accident' governs determination of principal support and disallows an arbitrary 12‑month rule; and that where employment is non‑continuous the annual wage for compensation purposes is calculated under s.9(3) by combining remuneration during the active period with the worker's earnings during the remainder of the year. Applying these rules, the deceased was the principal support and the award was properly calculated, so the appeal was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs; judgment of the Court of King's Bench confirmed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Judgment of the Court of King's Bench affirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment