Kobold Corporation v. NCS Multistage Inc.
Court held as a matter of law that s.56(1) requires the pre- and post-claim acts to be the same (identical) with respect to the relevant inventive concept; subsections 56(6) and 56(9) afford a separate, broader defence to third parties for 'substantially the same' articles or services but do not apply to NCS on the record; the '561 Patent claims construed to distinguish 'secured' (requires co-movement/force transmission) from 'connected'; summary judgment granted on statutory interpretation and claim construction and on dismissal of s.56(6)/(9) defences, allowed NCS to continue manufacture/use of the pre-claim Mongoose device, but infringement and the applicability of s.56(1) require trial.
- Citation
- 2021 FC 1437
- Parties
- Plaintiff/defendant by Counterclaim: Kobold Corporation; Plaintiff/defendant by Counterclaim: Kobold Completions Inc.; Plaintiff/defendant by Counterclaim: 2039974 Alberta Ltd.; Defendant/plaintiff by Counterclaim: NCS Multistage Inc.
- Court
- Federal Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 7 January 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Patent Infringement; Summary Judgment Motion / Summary Judgment Decision; Remaining Issues to Proceed to Trial
- Outcome
- Partial summary judgment: interpretation of s.56(1) requires identical acts; s.56(6) and s.56(9) defences dismissed for the defendant; '561 Patent construed (distinction between 'secured' and 'connected'); defendant allowed to continue manufacture/use of Mongoose device; all other issues (infringement and...
- Legal Topics
- Prior User Defence, Section 56 Patent Act, Claim Construction, Summary Judgment, Infringement
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kobold Corporation
Plaintiff/defendant by Counterclaim
Kobold Completions Inc.
Plaintiff/defendant by Counterclaim
2039974 Alberta Ltd.
Plaintiff/defendant by Counterclaim
NCS Multistage Inc.
Defendant/plaintiff by Counterclaim
Procedural Posture
Patent Infringement; Summary Judgment Motion / Summary Judgment Decision; Remaining Issues to Proceed to Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether summary judgment/summary trial appropriate
- 2 Proper interpretation of s.56 of the Patent Act
- 3 Construction of Canadian Patent No. 2,919,561 ('561 Patent)
Ratio Decidendi
Court held as a matter of law that s.56(1) requires the pre- and post-claim acts to be the same (identical) with respect to the relevant inventive concept; subsections 56(6) and 56(9) afford a separate, broader defence to third parties for 'substantially the same' articles or services but do not apply to NCS on the record; the '561 Patent claims construed to distinguish 'secured' (requires co-movement/force transmission) from 'connected'; summary judgment granted on statutory interpretation and claim construction and on dismissal of s.56(6)/(9) defences, allowed NCS to continue manufacture/use of the pre-claim Mongoose device, but infringement and the applicability of s.56(1) require trial.
Court Disposition
Partial summary judgment: interpretation of s.56(1) requires identical acts; s.56(6) and s.56(9) defences dismissed for the defendant; '561 Patent construed (distinction between 'secured' and 'connected'); defendant allowed to continue manufacture/use of Mongoose device; all other issues (infringement and...
Orders
- Summary judgment granted on interpretation of subsections 56(1), (6) and (9) of the Patent Act as described in Reasons
- Summary judgment granted to Plaintiffs dismissing Defendant's defences under subsections 56(6) and (9) of the Patent Act
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment