Blackburn (Re)
Master Baker's orders were set aside because his decisions rested materially on a demonstrably incorrect factual premise (that the Trustee did not have the cheques prior to March 11, 2010); the trustee's disallowance of the Csillags' claim against Mrs. Blackburn was upheld, but the claims against Mr. Blackburn could not be finally determined on the record before the court and must be pursued in the Civil Action where the necessary evidence can be developed and tested.
- Citation
- 2011 BCSC 1572
- Parties
- Debtor: Bernard Francis Blackburn; Debtor: Kim Yvonne Blackburn; Trustee: Meyers Norris Penny Limited; Appellant/creditor: Zsolt Csillag; Appellant/creditor: Anna Csillag
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 21 November 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Appeal Under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act / Appeal to Supreme Court of British Columbia From Master Baker's Orders Following Trustee Disallowance of Proofs of Claim
- Outcome
- The Orders of Master Baker dated August 11, 2010 are set aside; the Trustee's disallowance of the claims against Mrs. Blackburn is upheld and she is granted a conditional discharge on the same terms; the Csillags must pursue their claims against Mr. Blackburn within the Civil Action; costs adjourned.
- Legal Topics
- Proofs of Claim, Disallowance of Claims, Standard of Review, Fresh Vs New Evidence, Lifting the Corporate Veil, Bankruptcy Discharge
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bernard Francis Blackburn
Debtor
Kim Yvonne Blackburn
Debtor
Meyers Norris Penny Limited
Trustee
Zsolt Csillag
Appellant/creditor
Anna Csillag
Appellant/creditor
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Appeal Under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act / Appeal to Supreme Court of British Columbia From Master Baker's Orders Following Trustee Disallowance of Proofs of Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Trustee correctly disallowed the Csillags' proofs of claim
- 2 Whether Master Baker erred by excluding evidence not before the Trustee on the date of disallowance (Galaxy Sports issue)
- 3 Whether the corporate veil should be pierced to hold Mr. Blackburn personally liable for obligations of Meadowbrook
Ratio Decidendi
Master Baker's orders were set aside because his decisions rested materially on a demonstrably incorrect factual premise (that the Trustee did not have the cheques prior to March 11, 2010); the trustee's disallowance of the Csillags' claim against Mrs. Blackburn was upheld, but the claims against Mr. Blackburn could not be finally determined on the record before the court and must be pursued in the Civil Action where the necessary evidence can be developed and tested.
Court Disposition
The Orders of Master Baker dated August 11, 2010 are set aside; the Trustee's disallowance of the claims against Mrs. Blackburn is upheld and she is granted a conditional discharge on the same terms; the Csillags must pursue their claims against Mr. Blackburn within the Civil Action; costs adjourned.
Orders
- Orders of Master Baker made August 11, 2010 are set aside.
- Trustee's disallowance of the claims of Mr. and Mrs. Csillag against Mrs. Blackburn is upheld; Mrs. Blackburn is to be granted a Conditional Discharge in Bankruptcy on the same terms as set by Master Baker.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment