Foster Miller Inc. v. Babcock & Wilcox Industries Ltd.
The court accepted the plaintiffs' affidavit evidence that disclosure of the Schedule A licensing reports and Schedule B documents could harm plaintiffs' commercial interests and that there was precedent and a prior consent confidentiality agreement supporting protection. Balancing the open court principle and the need to protect bona fide commercial and technical secrets in pre-trial preparation, the court granted the confidentiality order: Schedule A documents are subject to Rule 152(2) and entitled to "for counsel's eyes only" protection; Schedule B documents are confidential but may be disclosed only to solicitors of record/assisting solicitors and two designated employees of the...
- Citation
- 2002 FCT 428
- Parties
- Plaintiff/defendant by Counterclaim: Foster-Miller, Inc.; Plaintiff/defendant by Counterclaim: Electric Power Research Institute, Inc.; Plaintiff/defendant by Counterclaim: Foster-Miller, Canada Ltd.; Defendant/plaintiff by Counterclaim: Babcock & Wilcox Industries Ltd.; Defendant/plaintiff by Counterclaim: Babcock & Wilcox Canada Ltd.
- Court
- Federal Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 12 April 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Motion for Confidentiality/protective Order Under Rule 151 / Pre Trial Motion Hearing (confidentiality)
- Outcome
- Confidentiality order granted
- Legal Topics
- Protective Order, Confidentiality Order, Discovery, Expurgation, For Counsels Eyes Only
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Foster-Miller, Inc.
Plaintiff/defendant by Counterclaim
Electric Power Research Institute, Inc.
Plaintiff/defendant by Counterclaim
Foster-Miller, Canada Ltd.
Plaintiff/defendant by Counterclaim
Babcock & Wilcox Industries Ltd.
Defendant/plaintiff by Counterclaim
Babcock & Wilcox Canada Ltd.
Defendant/plaintiff by Counterclaim
Procedural Posture
Motion for Confidentiality/protective Order Under Rule 151 / Pre Trial Motion Hearing (confidentiality)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a confidentiality/protective order should be issued under Rules 151 and 152 of the Federal Court Rules, 1998
- 2 Whether certain documents merit "for counsel's eyes only" protection or restricted disclosure to designated employees
- 3 Whether affidavit evidence establishes that disclosure would harm commercial interests and justify restrictions on disclosure to parties or the public
Ratio Decidendi
The court accepted the plaintiffs' affidavit evidence that disclosure of the Schedule A licensing reports and Schedule B documents could harm plaintiffs' commercial interests and that there was precedent and a prior consent confidentiality agreement supporting protection. Balancing the open court principle and the need to protect bona fide commercial and technical secrets in pre-trial preparation, the court granted the confidentiality order: Schedule A documents are subject to Rule 152(2) and entitled to "for counsel's eyes only" protection; Schedule B documents are confidential but may be disclosed only to solicitors of record/assisting solicitors and two designated employees of the...
Court Disposition
Confidentiality order granted
Orders
- Confidentiality order granted in the form annexed to reasons
- Documents listed in Schedule A subject to requirements of Rule 152(2) ("for counsel's eyes only" protection)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment