P.S. v. Ontario

P.S. v. Ontario

The Court allowed the appeal in part and varied paragraph 1 of the Superior Court order to reflect the parties' agreement while maintaining the publication restriction mandated by ss.486.4 and 486.6 of the Criminal Code; the variation was necessary to align the order with applicable statutory protections and the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2008 ONCA 550
Parties
Applicant: P.S.; Respondent: Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario; Respondent: Centre for Addiction and Mental Health; Respondent: Royal Ottawa Health Care Group; Respondent: St. Joseph's Health Care, London; Respondent: Attorney General for Ontario
Court
Court of Appeal for Ontario
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
8 July 2008
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (publication Restriction Arising From Criminal Proceedings) / Court of Appeal Decision on Appeal From Superior Court Order
Outcome
Appeal allowed in part; paragraph 1 of the order below varied in accordance with the parties' agreement; no order as to costs.
Legal Topics
Publication Ban, Identification of Complainant and Witnesses, S.486.4 Criminal Code, Appeal and Variation of Order
Source Language
en
Civil Criminal Procedure Privacy Publication Bans Publication Ban Identification of Complainant and Witnesses S.486.4 Criminal Code Appeal and Variation of Order

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

P.S.

Applicant

Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario

Respondent

Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

Respondent

Royal Ottawa Health Care Group

Respondent

St. Joseph's Health Care, London

Respondent

Attorney General for Ontario

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal (publication Restriction Arising From Criminal Proceedings) / Court of Appeal Decision on Appeal From Superior Court Order

  1. 1 Whether the publication restriction under ss.486.4 and 486.6 of the Criminal Code should continue
  2. 2 What modification, if any, should be made to paragraph 1 of the Superior Court order on appeal
  3. 3 Scope and application of statutory publication bans to protect identities of complainants and witnesses

Ratio Decidendi

The Court allowed the appeal in part and varied paragraph 1 of the Superior Court order to reflect the parties' agreement while maintaining the publication restriction mandated by ss.486.4 and 486.6 of the Criminal Code; the variation was necessary to align the order with applicable statutory protections and the parties' agreed terms.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed in part; paragraph 1 of the order below varied in accordance with the parties' agreement; no order as to costs.

Orders

  • Appeal allowed in part.
  • Paragraph 1 of the Superior Court order dated February 6, 2008 is varied in accordance with the agreement of the parties attached to the Court file.