P.S. v. Ontario
The Court allowed the appeal in part and varied paragraph 1 of the Superior Court order to reflect the parties' agreement while maintaining the publication restriction mandated by ss.486.4 and 486.6 of the Criminal Code; the variation was necessary to align the order with applicable statutory protections and the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2008 ONCA 550
- Parties
- Applicant: P.S.; Respondent: Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario; Respondent: Centre for Addiction and Mental Health; Respondent: Royal Ottawa Health Care Group; Respondent: St. Joseph's Health Care, London; Respondent: Attorney General for Ontario
- Court
- Court of Appeal for Ontario
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 8 July 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (publication Restriction Arising From Criminal Proceedings) / Court of Appeal Decision on Appeal From Superior Court Order
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; paragraph 1 of the order below varied in accordance with the parties' agreement; no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- Publication Ban, Identification of Complainant and Witnesses, S.486.4 Criminal Code, Appeal and Variation of Order
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
P.S.
Applicant
Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario
Respondent
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Respondent
Royal Ottawa Health Care Group
Respondent
St. Joseph's Health Care, London
Respondent
Attorney General for Ontario
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (publication Restriction Arising From Criminal Proceedings) / Court of Appeal Decision on Appeal From Superior Court Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the publication restriction under ss.486.4 and 486.6 of the Criminal Code should continue
- 2 What modification, if any, should be made to paragraph 1 of the Superior Court order on appeal
- 3 Scope and application of statutory publication bans to protect identities of complainants and witnesses
Ratio Decidendi
The Court allowed the appeal in part and varied paragraph 1 of the Superior Court order to reflect the parties' agreement while maintaining the publication restriction mandated by ss.486.4 and 486.6 of the Criminal Code; the variation was necessary to align the order with applicable statutory protections and the parties' agreed terms.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; paragraph 1 of the order below varied in accordance with the parties' agreement; no order as to costs.
Orders
- Appeal allowed in part.
- Paragraph 1 of the Superior Court order dated February 6, 2008 is varied in accordance with the agreement of the parties attached to the Court file.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
P.S. v. Ontario Collection Decisions of the Court of Appeal Date 2008-07-08 Neutral citation 2008 ONCA 550 Docket numbers C48454 Judges O’Connor, Dennis; Moldaver, Michael James; MacFarland, Jean Louise Subject Civil Decision Content WARNING The President of the panel hearing this appeal directs that the following should be attached to the file: An order restricting publication in this proceeding under ss. 486.4(1), (2), (3) or (4) or 486.6(1) or (2) of the Criminal Code shall continue. These sections of the Criminal Code provide: 486.4 (1) Subject to subsection (2), the presiding judge or justice may make an order directing that any information that could identify the complainant or a witness shall not be published in any document or broadcast or transmitted in any way, in proceedings in respect of: (a) any of the following offences: (i) an offence under section 151, 152, 153, 153.1, 155, 159, 160, 162, 163.1, 170, 171, 172, 172.1, 173, 210, 211, 212, 213, 271, 272, 273, 279.01, 279.02, 279.03, 346 or 347, (ii) an offence under section 144 (rape), 145 (attempt to commit rape), 149 (indecent assault on female), 156 (indecent assault on male) or 245 (common assault) or subsection 246(1) (assault with intent) of the Criminal Code, chapter C-34 of the Revised Statutes of Canada, 1970, as it read immediately before January 4, 1983, or (iii) an offence under subsection 146(1) (sexual intercourse with a female under 14) or (2) (sexual intercourse with a female between 14 and 16) or section 151 (seduction of a female between 16 and 18), 153 (sexual intercourse with step-daughter), 155 (buggery or bestiality), 157 (gross indecency), 166 (parent or guardian procuring defilement) or 167 (householder permitting defilement) of the Criminal Code, chapter C-34 of the Revised Statutes of Canada, 1970, as it read immediately before January 1, 1988; or (b) two or more offences being dealt with in the same proceeding, at least one of which is an offence referred to in any of subparagraphs (a)(i) to (iii). (2) In proceedings in respect of the offences referred to in paragraph (1)(a) or (b), the presiding judge or justice shall (a) at the first reasonable opportunity, inform any witness under the age of eighteen years and the complainant of the right to make an application for the order; and (b) on application made by the complainant, the prosecutor or any such witness, make the order. (3) In proceedings in respect of an offence under section 163.1, a judge or justice shall make an order directing that any information that could identify a witness who is under the age of eighteen years, or any person who is the subject of a representation, written material or a recording that constitutes child pornography within the meaning of that section, shall not be published in any document or broadcast or transmitted in any way. (4) An order made under this section does not apply in respect of the disclosure of information in the course of the administration of justice when it is not the purpose of the disclosure to make the information known in the community. 2005, c. 32, s. 15; 2005, c. 43, s. 8(3)(b). . . . 486.6 (1) Every person who fails to comply with an order made under subsection 486.4(1), (2) or (3) or 486.5(1) or (2) is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction. (2) For greater certainty, an order referred to in subsection (1) applies to prohibit, in relation to proceedings taken against any person who fails to comply with the order, the publication in any document or the broadcasting or transmission in any way of information that could identify a victim, witness or justice system participant whose identity is protected by the order. 2005, c. 32, s. 15. CITATION: P.S. v. Ontario, 2008 ONCA 550 DATE: 20080708 DOCKET: C48454 COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO O’CONNOR A.C.J.O., MOLDAVER and MACFARLAND JJ.A. BETWEEN: P.S. Applicant (Appellant) and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF ONTARIO, CENTRE FOR ADDICTION AND MENTAL HEALTH, ROYAL OTTAWA HEALTH CARE GROUP, ST. JOSEPH’S HEALTH CARE, LONDON and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR ONTARIO Respondents (Respondents in Appeal) Marshall A. Swadron and Mercedes Perez for the applicant/appellant Janice Blackburn for the respondent, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health Caroline Failes for the respondent, Royal Ottawa Health Care Group David Nash for the respondent, St. Joseph’s Health Care, London Elaine Atkinson for the respondent, Ontario (HMQ) Attorney General Ontario Heard: June 30, 2008 On appeal from the order of Justice Clair Marchand of the Superior Court of Justice dated February 6, 2008. APPEAL BOOK ENDORSEMENT [1] The appeal is allowed in part, and paragraph 1 of the order below is varied in accordance with the agreement of the parties attached hereto. [2] No order as to costs.