Sikora v. Asbestonos Corp. Ltd.
The jury's award was inordinately high and unsupported by the evidence; the Court of Appeal was correct to set it aside and, with counsel's consent under s.47, the Supreme Court properly fixed general damages at $20,000 and entered judgment accordingly.
- Citation
- [1975] 1 SCR 115
- Parties
- Plaintiff Appellant: Edmund Sikora; Defendant Respondent: Asbestonos Corporation Limited; Defendant Respondent: Michel Rioux
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 11 February 1974
- Procedural Posture
- Tort Personal Injury / Appeal From Court of Appeal for Ontario; Supreme Court Exercised S.47 Power to Fix Damages After Consent of Counsel
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Quantum of Damages, Jury Verdict Review, Judicial Reassessment Under Statute, S.47 Supreme Court Act
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Edmund Sikora
Plaintiff Appellant
Asbestonos Corporation Limited
Defendant Respondent
Michel Rioux
Defendant Respondent
Procedural Posture
Tort Personal Injury / Appeal From Court of Appeal for Ontario; Supreme Court Exercised S.47 Power to Fix Damages After Consent of Counsel
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the jury's award of $45,000 in general damages was excessive
- 2 Whether the Ontario Court of Appeal was correct to set aside the jury verdict
- 3 Whether the Supreme Court should exercise s.47 to fix the quantum of general damages
Ratio Decidendi
The jury's award was inordinately high and unsupported by the evidence; the Court of Appeal was correct to set it aside and, with counsel's consent under s.47, the Supreme Court properly fixed general damages at $20,000 and entered judgment accordingly.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- General damages assessed at $20,000
- Special damages agreed at $1,130
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment