Tynes v. Killam Properties Inc.

Tynes v. Killam Properties Inc.

The Director's order was rescinded because the evidence did not establish on the balance of probabilities that the tenant committed a fundamental breach of the lease (quiet enjoyment) warranting termination; the complainant's credibility was unreliable and other evidence did not sufficiently attribute the noise to the tenant; long‑standing tenancy and security of tenure weigh against eviction.

Citation
2011 NSSM 31
Parties
Tenant (appellant): Valerie Tynes; Landlord (respondent): Killam Properties Inc.
Court
Nova Scotia Small Claims Court
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
12 May 2011
Procedural Posture
Residential Tenancies Appeal in Small Claims Court / Appeal Decision Rendered
Outcome
Appeal allowed; Director's order granting vacant possession rescinded; landlord's application for termination dismissed
Legal Topics
Quiet Enjoyment, Termination of Tenancy, Evidence and Credibility, Standard of Proof, Tenant Security of Tenure
Source Language
English
Residential Tenancies Landlord and Tenant Eviction Noise/nuisance Quiet Enjoyment Termination of Tenancy Evidence and Credibility Standard of Proof +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Valerie Tynes

Tenant (appellant)

Killam Properties Inc.

Landlord (respondent)

Procedural Posture

Residential Tenancies Appeal in Small Claims Court / Appeal Decision Rendered

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether tenant breached the quiet enjoyment clause by creating excessive noise
  2. 2 Whether the landlord had sufficient legal grounds to terminate tenancy
  3. 3 Credibility of the complainant and other witnesses

Ratio Decidendi

The Director's order was rescinded because the evidence did not establish on the balance of probabilities that the tenant committed a fundamental breach of the lease (quiet enjoyment) warranting termination; the complainant's credibility was unreliable and other evidence did not sufficiently attribute the noise to the tenant; long‑standing tenancy and security of tenure weigh against eviction.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; Director's order granting vacant possession rescinded; landlord's application for termination dismissed

Orders

  • Residential Tenancies Director's order dated April 14, 2011 rescinded
  • Landlord's application for termination of the tenancy dismissed