Exeter v. Canada (Attorney General)

Exeter v. Canada (Attorney General)

The Court held there was no error in the Motions Judge's decision and no reasonable apprehension of bias; the Prothonotary properly exercised her discretion not to stay proceedings, therefore the appeal is dismissed and costs are awarded.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2016 FCA 18
Parties
Appellant: Rachel Exeter; Respondent: Attorney General of Canada (Deputy Head, Statistics Canada)
Court
Federal Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
20 January 2016
Procedural Posture
Appeal (interlocutory) / Appeal From Motions Judge's Order
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Stay, Interlocutory Order, Bias, Prothonotary Discretion, Costs Sanction
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Procedural Law Judicial Review Costs Stay Interlocutory Order Bias Prothonotary Discretion +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rachel Exeter

Appellant

Attorney General of Canada (Deputy Head, Statistics Canada)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal (interlocutory) / Appeal From Motions Judge's Order

  1. 1 Whether the Motions Judge erred in refusing to stay the proceeding
  2. 2 Whether there was a reasonable apprehension of bias amounting to disqualification
  3. 3 Whether the Prothonotary properly exercised her discretion not to stay proceedings

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held there was no error in the Motions Judge's decision and no reasonable apprehension of bias; the Prothonotary properly exercised her discretion not to stay proceedings, therefore the appeal is dismissed and costs are awarded.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed.
  • All-inclusive costs assessed at $5,000 payable forthwith.