Bhaskaran v. Canada
The Applicant failed to demonstrate any error in the judgment of Bonner J.; therefore the application is dismissed.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2002 FCA 71
- Parties
- Applicant: Ramesha Bhaskaran; Respondent: Her Majesty the Queen
- Court
- Federal Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 25 February 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Disposition
- Outcome
- Application dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Costs
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ramesha Bhaskaran
Applicant
Her Majesty the Queen
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Disposition
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Applicant demonstrated any error in the judgment of Bonner J.
- 2 Whether the Applicant is entitled to any relief or costs against the Respondent.
Ratio Decidendi
The Applicant failed to demonstrate any error in the judgment of Bonner J.; therefore the application is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed.
Orders
- Application dismissed.
- Costs of $1,000 inclusive of disbursements payable to the Respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Bhaskaran v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2002-02-25 Neutral citation 2002 FCA 71 File numbers A-84-01 Decision Content Date: 20020225 Docket: A-84-01 Neutral citation: 2002 FCA 71 CORAM: ROTHSTEIN J.A. SEXTON J.A. EVANS J.A. BETWEEN: RAMESHA BHASKARAN Applicant - and - HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on February 25, 2002 Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario on February 25, 2002 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: ROTHSTEIN J.A. Date: 20020225 Docket: A-84-01 Neutral citation: 2002 FCA 71 CORAM: ROTHSTEIN J.A. SEXTON J.A. EVANS. J.A. BETWEEN: RAMESHA BHASKARAN Applicant - and - HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario on Monday, February 25, 2002) ROTHSTEIN J.A. [1] The Applicant has failed to demonstrate any error in the judgment of Bonner J. The application will be dismissed with costs of $1,000 inclusive of disbursements payable to the Respondent. "Marshall Rothstein" J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA Names of Counsel and Solicitors of Record DOCKET: A-84-01 STYLE OF CAUSE: RAMESHA BHASKARAN Applicant - and - HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent DATE OF HEARING: MONDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 2002 PLACE OF HEARING: TORONTO, ONTARIO REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: ROTHSTEIN J.A. DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH AT TORONTO, ONTARIO ON MONDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 2002. APPEARANCES BY: Ramesha Bhaskaran For the Applicant, on his own behalf Marilyn Vardy, and Andrea Jackett For the Respondent SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Ramesha Bhaskaran Unit 104-C 54 Sidney Belsey Crescent Toronto, Ontario M6M 5A6 For the Applicant Morris Rosenberg Deputy Attorney General of Canada For the Respondent FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL Date: 20020225 Docket: A-84-01 BETWEEN: RAMESHA BHASKARAN Applicant - and - HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT