Fagan v. Fredericks
The defendant's misrepresentation regarding mileage (even if innocent) entitled the claimant to rescind the transaction and recover consequential expenses because she never agreed to limit her claim to the $5,000 immediate payment; accordingly judgment awarded her the claimed expenses and filing and service costs, but not general damages.
- Citation
- 2014 NSSM 29
- Parties
- Claimant: Harriet Ramona Fagan; Defendant: Randy Fredericks
- Court
- Nova Scotia Small Claims Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 15 May 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Small Claims Court / Decision (judgment Rendered)
- Outcome
- Judgment for the Claimant
- Legal Topics
- Misrepresentation, Rescission, Consequential Damages, Odometer/mileage Misstatement, As Is Sale
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Harriet Ramona Fagan
Claimant
Randy Fredericks
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Small Claims Court / Decision (judgment Rendered)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant misrepresented the vehicle's mileage
- 2 Whether the claimant was entitled to rescind the sale and recover consequential losses
- 3 Whether the claimant waived rights by accepting partial payment when returning the vehicle
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant's misrepresentation regarding mileage (even if innocent) entitled the claimant to rescind the transaction and recover consequential expenses because she never agreed to limit her claim to the $5,000 immediate payment; accordingly judgment awarded her the claimed expenses and filing and service costs, but not general damages.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the Claimant
Orders
- Judgment in favour of the Claimant for $529.56 (consequential expenses)
- Plus $96.80 for cost of issuing the claim
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment