R. v. Lincoln

R. v. Lincoln

The trial judge erred in considering the appellant's association with a known drug dealer, but the remaining evidence established beyond a reasonable doubt that the appellant possessed the cocaine; applying the appellate proviso, the appeal is dismissed and the conviction is upheld.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2017 ONCA 113
Parties
Respondent: Her Majesty the Queen; Appellant: Raymond Lincoln
Court
Court of Appeal for Ontario
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
6 March 2017
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Appeal From Conviction (court of Appeal)
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; conviction upheld.
Legal Topics
Possession of Controlled Substance, Evidence, Appellate Proviso
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Possession of Controlled Substance Evidence Appellate Proviso

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Her Majesty the Queen

Respondent

Raymond Lincoln

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Appeal From Conviction (court of Appeal)

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge improperly relied on the appellant's presence with a known active member of the drug trade when finding possession
  2. 2 Whether the appellate proviso applies to uphold the conviction despite that evidentiary error

Ratio Decidendi

The trial judge erred in considering the appellant's association with a known drug dealer, but the remaining evidence established beyond a reasonable doubt that the appellant possessed the cocaine; applying the appellate proviso, the appeal is dismissed and the conviction is upheld.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; conviction upheld.

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • Conviction upheld