Ali Estate (Re)
The court has no jurisdiction in this case to add the words sought to the will at the probate stage; on the evidence the solicitor deliberately used the phrase 'all my interest in the Company' and the testator knew and approved the will's language, therefore rectification is denied and interpretation is to be determined only after the grant of probate with evidence admissible for construction.
- Citation
- 2011 BCSC 537
- Parties
- Petitioner; Co Executor; Brother of Testator: Maksood Ali; Respondent; Co Executor; Daughter and Residuary Beneficiary: Razaanah Rabah Ali; Respondent; Claimant Under Wills Variation Act: Christina Neelu Hussain; Respondent; Claimant Under Wills Variation Act: Sophia Dibah Manikiam; Deceased / Testator: Estate of Muntaz Mohamed Ali
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 18 January 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Probate (rectification) and Construction (interpretation) / Application Heard Pre Probate; Rectification Dismissed; Construction Deferred Until After Grant of Probate
- Outcome
- Application to rectify the will dismissed; construction application deferred until after grant of probate; costs awarded as directed
- Legal Topics
- Rectification of Wills, Construction of Wills, Admissibility of Extrinsic Evidence, Costs
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Maksood Ali
Petitioner; Co Executor; Brother of Testator
Razaanah Rabah Ali
Respondent; Co Executor; Daughter and Residuary Beneficiary
Christina Neelu Hussain
Respondent; Claimant Under Wills Variation Act
Sophia Dibah Manikiam
Respondent; Claimant Under Wills Variation Act
Estate of Muntaz Mohamed Ali
Deceased / Testator
Procedural Posture
Probate (rectification) and Construction (interpretation) / Application Heard Pre Probate; Rectification Dismissed; Construction Deferred Until After Grant of Probate
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court exercising probate jurisdiction may add words to a will (rectification)
- 2 Whether shareholder loans and promissory note are included in the bequest of the testator's interest in the company
- 3 Whether the court should interpret the will prior to grant of probate
Ratio Decidendi
The court has no jurisdiction in this case to add the words sought to the will at the probate stage; on the evidence the solicitor deliberately used the phrase 'all my interest in the Company' and the testator knew and approved the will's language, therefore rectification is denied and interpretation is to be determined only after the grant of probate with evidence admissible for construction.
Court Disposition
Application to rectify the will dismissed; construction application deferred until after grant of probate; costs awarded as directed
Orders
- Application to rectify the Will dismissed.
- Petitioner to obtain grant of probate and then reset the hearing of the construction application before the same judge with affidavits limited to evidence admissible on a construction application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment