MA7-01197
The claimant's evidence was found not credible and insufficiently corroborated, including implausible and inconsistent accounts of key incidents and omissions to authorities; consequently he failed to establish he is a homosexual who would face a serious possibility of persecution or a real risk of torture, death or cruel and unusual treatment on return to Albania, and therefore is not a Convention refugee under s.96 nor a person in need of protection under s.97(1) IRPA.
- Citation
- MA7-01197
- Parties
- Claimant: XXXXX XXXXX; Respondent: Refugee Protection Officer
- Court
- Refugee Protection Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 26 July 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection Claim / Refugee Protection Division Hearing and Decision
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed; claimant rejected as neither a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection under sections 96 and 97(1) IRPA
- Legal Topics
- Refugee Protection, Convention Refugee, Particular Social Group, Sexual Orientation, Credibility Assessment, Persecution, Sexual Assault / Rape, Return to Albania, Negative Decision
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXXX XXXXX
Claimant
Refugee Protection Officer
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Claim / Refugee Protection Division Hearing and Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether claimant is a citizen of Albania
- 2 Whether claimant is homosexual and belongs to a particular social group
- 3 Credibility of claimant's testimony and documentary evidence
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant's evidence was found not credible and insufficiently corroborated, including implausible and inconsistent accounts of key incidents and omissions to authorities; consequently he failed to establish he is a homosexual who would face a serious possibility of persecution or a real risk of torture, death or cruel and unusual treatment on return to Albania, and therefore is not a Convention refugee under s.96 nor a person in need of protection under s.97(1) IRPA.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed; claimant rejected as neither a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection under sections 96 and 97(1) IRPA
Orders
- The claimant's refugee protection claim is refused
- Claimant is not a Convention refugee under section 96 of IRPA and not a person in need of protection under section 97(1) of IRPA
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment