VB7-04501
The Board found the claimants not credible regarding alleged post-2014 targeting, concluded extortion lacked nexus to a Convention ground, and determined on the balance of probabilities that claimants did not face a personal risk to life or cruel and unusual treatment and that discriminatory treatment did not amount to persecution; therefore claims dismissed under sections 96 and 97.
- Citation
- VB7-04501
- Parties
- Principal Claimant/the Husband: XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX; Associated Claimant/the Wife: XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX; Associated Claimant/the Daughter: XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
- Court
- Refugee Protection Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 18 December 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection Claim Under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act / Decision Following Hearing
- Outcome
- Claims rejected; claimants are not Convention refugees and not persons in need of protection
- Legal Topics
- Refugee Protection, Persecution, Nexus to Convention Grounds, Credibility Findings, Internal Flight Alternative, Extortion (vacuna), Racial Discrimination, Risk Assessment Under S.97
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
Principal Claimant/the Husband
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
Associated Claimant/the Wife
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
Associated Claimant/the Daughter
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Claim Under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act / Decision Following Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether claimants are Convention refugees under section 96 of the Act
- 2 Whether claimants are persons in need of protection under subsection 97(1) of the Act
- 3 Whether there is nexus between the harm feared and a Convention ground (race)
Ratio Decidendi
The Board found the claimants not credible regarding alleged post-2014 targeting, concluded extortion lacked nexus to a Convention ground, and determined on the balance of probabilities that claimants did not face a personal risk to life or cruel and unusual treatment and that discriminatory treatment did not amount to persecution; therefore claims dismissed under sections 96 and 97.
Court Disposition
Claims rejected; claimants are not Convention refugees and not persons in need of protection
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment