Tam Estate

Tam Estate

The application to remove the executor was dismissed because the delays and conduct did not meet the established grounds for removal (no endangerment, dishonesty, incapacity, or want of reasonable fidelity proven), the testator's appointment should be respected and the majority of beneficiaries support the executor, and remaining administrative tasks are limited and capable of completion by the current executor; however, the executor must produce specified documents relating to the joint account to allow inquiry into potential estate claims.

Citation
2026 BCSC 738
Parties
Applicant/beneficiary: Sarah Chee-Wan Tam; Executor/respondent: Lisa Chee-May Tam; Deceased: Jeannie Chui Chun Tam; Beneficiary/alternate Executor: Isaac Tam; Beneficiary: Aaron Tam
Court
Supreme Court of British Columbia
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
28 April 2026
Procedural Posture
Application to Remove Executor (estate Administration) / Judgment on Application (application Heard March 26, 2026; Reasons April 28, 2026)
Outcome
Application to remove executor dismissed; application to appoint applicant as executor dismissed; limited production order granted.
Legal Topics
Removal of Executor, Appointment of Substitute Executor, Production of Documents, Passing of Accounts, Joint Account Presumption, Tax/clearance Certificate
Source Language
English
Wills and Estates Trusts Probate Civil Procedure Removal of Executor Appointment of Substitute Executor Production of Documents Passing of Accounts +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sarah Chee-Wan Tam

Applicant/beneficiary

Lisa Chee-May Tam

Executor/respondent

Jeannie Chui Chun Tam

Deceased

Isaac Tam

Beneficiary/alternate Executor

Aaron Tam

Beneficiary

Procedural Posture

Application to Remove Executor (estate Administration) / Judgment on Application (application Heard March 26, 2026; Reasons April 28, 2026)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant met the test for removal of the executor
  2. 2 Whether the applicant should be appointed in place of the named alternate executor
  3. 3 Whether documents relating to the joint account held by the deceased and Isaac must be produced

Ratio Decidendi

The application to remove the executor was dismissed because the delays and conduct did not meet the established grounds for removal (no endangerment, dishonesty, incapacity, or want of reasonable fidelity proven), the testator's appointment should be respected and the majority of beneficiaries support the executor, and remaining administrative tasks are limited and capable of completion by the current executor; however, the executor must produce specified documents relating to the joint account to allow inquiry into potential estate claims.

Court Disposition

Application to remove executor dismissed; application to appoint applicant as executor dismissed; limited production order granted.

Orders

  • Application to remove Lisa Tam as executor dismissed
  • Application to appoint Sarah Chee-Wan Tam as executor dismissed (Isaac passed over not ordered)