R. v. Taylor

R. v. Taylor

The appeal is dismissed because the inescapable inference from the trial judge's reasons is that he accepted the Crown's theory that the appellant's wounds were inflicted during the parking lot assault and he accepted the complainant's testimony that the wounds were not caused by flying glass, so there was no...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2015 ONCA 35
Parties
Respondent: Her Majesty the Queen; Appellant: Renardo Desmond Taylor
Court
Court of Appeal for Ontario
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
22 January 2015
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Appeal From Conviction
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Aggravated Assault, Causation, Trial Findings, Appeal
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Aggravated Assault Causation Trial Findings Appeal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Her Majesty the Queen

Respondent

Renardo Desmond Taylor

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Appeal From Conviction

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge failed to make a finding of causation for the appellant's wounds
  2. 2 Whether the wounds were caused during the parking lot swarming or by flying glass

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal is dismissed because the inescapable inference from the trial judge's reasons is that he accepted the Crown's theory that the appellant's wounds were inflicted during the parking lot assault and he accepted the complainant's testimony that the wounds were not caused by flying glass, so there was no failure to find causation.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • Conviction upheld