Wiseman v. British Columbia (Transportation & Highways)
Section 6 of the Family Compensation Act requires a single proceeding for the statutory class; the first action (12206) commenced after the statutory waiting period is the dominant family compensation action and must govern. To reconcile competing interests where a plaintiff in one action is a defendant in another, the proper remedy is consolidation under the first action with an amended writ and statement of claim incorporating all claimants and defendants, permitting separate legal representation for hostile plaintiffs and staying the second action as an irregularity, with procedural directions (service anew, new defences, new third party steps) to preserve fairness and compliance with...
- Citation
- 2007 BCSC 1447
- Parties
- Plaintiff and Defendant: Timothy Wiseman; Plaintiff (infant): Maeghan Wiseman; Plaintiff (infant): Tyler Blaisdell Wiseman; Plaintiff (litigation Guardian and Representative): Ruth Elizabeth Heuther; Defendant/third Party: Yellowhead Road & Bridge (Kootenay) Ltd.; Defendant/third Party: Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of British Columbia (Ministry of Transportation & Highways)
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 1 October 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Wrongful Death (family Compensation Act) Civil Tort / Appeal From Master's Interlocutory Orders (hearing De Novo)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; Master Bolton's approach upheld and refined by judge: 12206 designated governing family compensation action; 12207 stayed as irregularity; consolidation under 12206 with specified procedural orders.
- Legal Topics
- Representative Proceedings, Conflict of Interest, Consolidation and Joinder, Stay as Irregularity, Third Party / Contribution and Indemnity, Rules of Court and Solicitor of Record
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Timothy Wiseman
Plaintiff and Defendant
Maeghan Wiseman
Plaintiff (infant)
Tyler Blaisdell Wiseman
Plaintiff (infant)
Ruth Elizabeth Heuther
Plaintiff (litigation Guardian and Representative)
Yellowhead Road & Bridge (Kootenay) Ltd.
Defendant/third Party
Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of British Columbia (Ministry of Transportation & Highways)
Defendant/third Party
Procedural Posture
Wrongful Death (family Compensation Act) Civil Tort / Appeal From Master's Interlocutory Orders (hearing De Novo)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether s.6 of the Family Compensation Act permits multiple proceedings for the same subject matter
- 2 Whether a person who is a defendant can be included as a claimant in the single statutory family compensation action
- 3 Whether the first action (dominus litis) prevails and how to resolve competing family compensation actions
Ratio Decidendi
Section 6 of the Family Compensation Act requires a single proceeding for the statutory class; the first action (12206) commenced after the statutory waiting period is the dominant family compensation action and must govern. To reconcile competing interests where a plaintiff in one action is a defendant in another, the proper remedy is consolidation under the first action with an amended writ and statement of claim incorporating all claimants and defendants, permitting separate legal representation for hostile plaintiffs and staying the second action as an irregularity, with procedural directions (service anew, new defences, new third party steps) to preserve fairness and compliance with...
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; Master Bolton's approach upheld and refined by judge: 12206 designated governing family compensation action; 12207 stayed as irregularity; consolidation under 12206 with specified procedural orders.
Orders
- Action 12206 is the governing family compensation action and will continue
- The writ of summons in 12206 shall be amended to include the plaintiffs from 12207 and the defendants from 12207, including Dr. Timothy Wiseman as defendant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment