RF v Canada Employment Insurance Commission
The application is dismissed because the alleged settlement and modified ROE were already part of the record and therefore are not "new facts," and the applicant did not produce decisive evidence or show a mistake of fact by the General Division that would justify rescinding or amending the July 25, 2019 decision.
- Citation
- 2020 SST 301
- Parties
- Applicant: RF; Respondent: Canada Employment Insurance Commission
- Court
- Social Security Tribunal of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 22 January 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Insurance (ei) / Application to Rescind or Amend General Division Decision (s.66 DESD Act)
- Outcome
- Application dismissed; original decision cannot be rescinded or amended.
- Legal Topics
- Rescission or Amendment of Decision, Misconduct, Record of Employment (roe), Out of Court Settlement
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
RF
Applicant
Canada Employment Insurance Commission
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Insurance (ei) / Application to Rescind or Amend General Division Decision (s.66 DESD Act)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the July 25, 2019 General Division decision should be rescinded or amended
- 2 Whether the out-of-court settlement and modified ROE constitute new facts that are decisive of the issue
- 3 Whether positive references or ROE alteration negate a finding of dismissal for misconduct
Ratio Decidendi
The application is dismissed because the alleged settlement and modified ROE were already part of the record and therefore are not "new facts," and the applicant did not produce decisive evidence or show a mistake of fact by the General Division that would justify rescinding or amending the July 25, 2019 decision.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed; original decision cannot be rescinded or amended.
Orders
- Application dismissed.
- Original General Division decision dated July 25, 2019 remains in effect.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment