R. v. Condo
The appeal is dismissed because the Court was not persuaded that Justice MacPhee erred with respect to the submissions concerning conviction, designation or sentence.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- C38063
- Parties
- Respondent: Her Majesty the Queen; Appellant: Richard Paul Condo
- Court
- Court of Appeal for Ontario
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 10 September 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Appeal From Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Appeal, Conviction, Sentence, Designation
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty the Queen
Respondent
Richard Paul Condo
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Appeal From Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge erred in convicting the appellant
- 2 Whether the trial judge erred in the appellant's designation
- 3 Whether the trial judge erred in sentencing the appellant
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is dismissed because the Court was not persuaded that Justice MacPhee erred with respect to the submissions concerning conviction, designation or sentence.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
R. v. Condo Collection Decisions of the Court of Appeal Date 2003-09-10 Docket numbers C38063 Judges Catzman, Marvin Adrian; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Gillese, Eileen E. Subject Criminal Decision Content DATE: 20030910 DOCKET: C38063 COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO RE: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN (Respondent) -and- RICHARD PAUL CONDO (Appellant) BEFORE: CATZMAN, ABELLA and GILLESE JJ.A. COUNSEL: Richard J. Bosada for the appellant Stacey D. Young for the respondent HEARD & ENDORSED: September 9, 2003 On appeal from the conviction entered by Justice Bruce E. MacPhee of the Ontario Court of Justice dated April 14, 2000 and from the sentence imposed by Justice MacPhee on July 26, 2001. APPEAL BOOK ENDORSEMENT [1] Notwithstanding Mr. Bosada's thorough argument, we are not persuaded that MacPhee J. made any error in respect of any of the submissions made by Mr. Bosada either in respect of the appellant's conviction, designation or sentence. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.