McBride v. Canada (National Defence)

McBride v. Canada (National Defence)

The appeal is dismissed as moot because the appellant had already been released and no valid reason was advanced to justify hearing a moot appeal.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2008 FCA 268
Parties
Appellant: Robert Andrew McBride; Respondent: Minister of Defence
Court
Federal Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
16 September 2008
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Mootness, Interim Injunction, Release From Service, Costs
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Military Law Civil Procedure Mootness Interim Injunction Release From Service Costs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Robert Andrew McBride

Appellant

Minister of Defence

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether an interim injunction should restrain the release of the appellant from the Canadian Forces
  2. 2 Whether the appeal is moot given the appellant's subsequent release
  3. 3 Whether there are valid reasons to hear a moot appeal

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal is dismissed as moot because the appellant had already been released and no valid reason was advanced to justify hearing a moot appeal.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • Costs payable to the respondent assessed at $500