Tremblay v. Brown

Tremblay v. Brown

The claimant failed to prove that the defendant performed substandard work and in fact prevented completion by refusing access and terminating the contract; because the claimant caused the unilateral termination and provided insufficient evidence of deficiencies or quantifiable loss, the claim for reimbursement fails.

Citation
2005 NSSM 29
Parties
Claimant: Michel Tremblay; Defendant: Robert Brown operating as "Brownstone Construction"
Court
Nova Scotia Small Claims Court
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
16 January 2005
Procedural Posture
Small Claims Court — Contract/construction / Adjudication/decision
Outcome
Claim dismissed; no relief awarded to claimant.
Legal Topics
Breach of Contract, Non‑performance, Termination by Owner, Quantum of Damages, Standard of Work, Service of Pleadings
Source Language
English
Contract Law Construction Law Small Claims Court Procedure Civil Evidence Breach of Contract Non‑performance Termination by Owner Quantum of Damages +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Michel Tremblay

Claimant

Robert Brown operating as "Brownstone Construction"

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Small Claims Court — Contract/construction / Adjudication/decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendant breached the contract by failing to complete the agreed construction work
  2. 2 Whether the claimant wrongfully terminated the contract and prevented completion
  3. 3 Whether the claimant proved substandard work or actionable deficiencies

Ratio Decidendi

The claimant failed to prove that the defendant performed substandard work and in fact prevented completion by refusing access and terminating the contract; because the claimant caused the unilateral termination and provided insufficient evidence of deficiencies or quantifiable loss, the claim for reimbursement fails.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed; no relief awarded to claimant.

Orders

  • Claim dismissed
  • No damages awarded to claimant