R. v. Marsman

R. v. Marsman

The Crown failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused committed an unlawful assault or causally created a public disturbance: evidence supports that the accused acted in self-defence/engaged in a consensual fight and that the disturbance pre‑existed and continued independently of his involvement, therefore acquittal is required.

Citation
2004 NSPC 17
Parties
Prosecution: R.; Defendant: Robin Leslie Marsman
Court
Nova Scotia Provincial Court
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
27 February 2004
Procedural Posture
Criminal: Common Assault and Causing a Disturbance / Trial Decision (acquittal)
Outcome
Acquitted of common assault and of causing a disturbance; not guilty on both charges.
Legal Topics
Self Defence, Common Assault, Public Order: Causing a Disturbance (s.175 Criminal Code), Consent to Fight, Credibility Assessment
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

R.

Prosecution

Robin Leslie Marsman

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal: Common Assault and Causing a Disturbance / Trial Decision (acquittal)

  1. 1 Whether the accused acted in self-defence or intentionally used force against the complainant (common assault)
  2. 2 Whether the accused unlawfully caused a disturbance in a public place contrary to s.175 of the Criminal Code

Ratio Decidendi

The Crown failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused committed an unlawful assault or causally created a public disturbance: evidence supports that the accused acted in self-defence/engaged in a consensual fight and that the disturbance pre‑existed and continued independently of his involvement, therefore acquittal is required.

Court Disposition

Acquitted of common assault and of causing a disturbance; not guilty on both charges.

Orders

  • Acquittal entered on the record for common assault (case no. 1198177) and causing a disturbance (case no. 1198178)