R. v. King

R. v. King

The Court upheld the trial judge's finding that the appellant is presently unfit to stand trial because his delusional disavowal of the name in the Information prevents proper participation; the appeal was dismissed and the amendment of the Information was left to the authorities.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2007 ONCA 713
Parties
Respondent: Her Majesty the Queen; Appellant: Rodney King; Amicus Curiae: Michael Davies
Court
Court of Appeal for Ontario
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
18 October 2007
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Declaration of Unfitness to Stand Trial
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; trial judge's declaration that appellant is unfit to stand trial upheld.
Legal Topics
Fitness to Stand Trial, Amendment of Information, Delusional Belief Affecting Participation
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Mental Health Law Fitness to Stand Trial Amendment of Information Delusional Belief Affecting Participation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Her Majesty the Queen

Respondent

Rodney King

Appellant

Michael Davies

Amicus Curiae

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Declaration of Unfitness to Stand Trial

  1. 1 Whether the appellant is fit to stand trial
  2. 2 Whether the Information can or should be amended to the name the appellant uses
  3. 3 Whether the Court of Appeal should interfere with the trial judge's finding of unfitness

Ratio Decidendi

The Court upheld the trial judge's finding that the appellant is presently unfit to stand trial because his delusional disavowal of the name in the Information prevents proper participation; the appeal was dismissed and the amendment of the Information was left to the authorities.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; trial judge's declaration that appellant is unfit to stand trial upheld.

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed.
  • No interference with the trial judge's declaration that the appellant is unfit to stand trial.