Lumsden v. Richard
Adjudicator concluded defendant authorized an unauthorized entry amounting to trespass; evidence did not prove significant actual property damage so only general damages were appropriate; exemplary damages are unavailable in Small Claims Court; awarded maximum general damages of $100 plus court filing fees of $199.35, total $299.35.
- Citation
- 2026 NSSM 6
- Parties
- Claimant: Kirby Scott Burns Lumsden; Defendant: Ronald Reginald Richard
- Court
- Nova Scotia Small Claims Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 20 March 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Small Claims Court Trespass Claim / Final Decision
- Outcome
- Claim allowed in part; judgment for claimant
- Legal Topics
- Trespass, Damages, Nominal Damages, General Damages, Exemplary Damages, Credibility Assessment
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kirby Scott Burns Lumsden
Claimant
Ronald Reginald Richard
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Small Claims Court Trespass Claim / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a trespass occurred
- 2 Whether the claimant proved actual property damage
- 3 Proper measure of damages given statutory limits of Small Claims Court
Ratio Decidendi
Adjudicator concluded defendant authorized an unauthorized entry amounting to trespass; evidence did not prove significant actual property damage so only general damages were appropriate; exemplary damages are unavailable in Small Claims Court; awarded maximum general damages of $100 plus court filing fees of $199.35, total $299.35.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed in part; judgment for claimant
Orders
- Defendant to pay claimant $100.00 in general damages
- Defendant to pay claimant $199.35 in court filing fees
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment