Stewart v. Canada (Attorney General)

Stewart v. Canada (Attorney General)

The trial judge did not commit any legal errors and no palpable or overriding factual errors were identified; therefore appellate intervention was not warranted and the appeal must be dismissed.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2001 FCA 128
Parties
Appellant: Rose A. Beckford Stewart; Respondent: The Attorney General of Canada on behalf of Her Majesty the Queen
Court
Federal Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
27 April 2001
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Decision
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Excessive Force, Arrest, Standard of Review, Findings of Fact
Source Language
en
Tort Police Law Civil Procedure Excessive Force Arrest Standard of Review Findings of Fact

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rose A. Beckford Stewart

Appellant

The Attorney General of Canada on behalf of Her Majesty the Queen

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal Decision

  1. 1 Whether the officers used excessive force in arresting the appellant
  2. 2 Whether the trial judge committed legal error in her findings
  3. 3 Whether any factual findings were palpably or overridingly erroneous

Ratio Decidendi

The trial judge did not commit any legal errors and no palpable or overriding factual errors were identified; therefore appellate intervention was not warranted and the appeal must be dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs