Chuang v. Royal College of Dental Surgeons of Ontario

Chuang v. Royal College of Dental Surgeons of Ontario

The appellant's pattern of behaviour met the criteria for a vexatious litigant as set out by Henry J. in Lang Michener v. Fabian, therefore the appeal must be dismissed and costs awarded.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2008 ONCA 35
Parties
Applicant (appellant): Dr. David Chuang, DMD; Respondent: Royal College of Dental Surgeons of Ontario
Court
Court of Appeal for Ontario
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
21 January 2008
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Superior Court Order (motion Judge)
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Vexatious Litigant, Costs, Appeal Dismissal
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Vexatious Litigant Costs Appeal Dismissal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dr. David Chuang, DMD

Applicant (appellant)

Royal College of Dental Surgeons of Ontario

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Superior Court Order (motion Judge)

  1. 1 Whether the appellant is a vexatious litigant
  2. 2 Whether the motion judge's order should be set aside
  3. 3 Appropriate costs to be awarded

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant's pattern of behaviour met the criteria for a vexatious litigant as set out by Henry J. in Lang Michener v. Fabian, therefore the appeal must be dismissed and costs awarded.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • Costs fixed at $10,000 inclusive of disbursements and G.S.T.