R.T.F. v. S.L.R.
Supervised access was necessary and appropriate because there was no reliable evidence of sexual abuse of M or R, Family and Children’s Services did not oppose supervised access, an experienced supervisor (Nicole Evans) was proposed and approved by the agency, the children had a prior beneficial relationship with...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2005 NSSC 102
- Parties
- Applicant: R.T.F.; Respondent: S.L.R.
- Court
- Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 5 May 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law Custody/access / Application for Supervised Access (interim Order)
- Outcome
- supervised access granted
- Legal Topics
- Supervised Access, Custody, Best Interests of the Child, Recognizance Variation, Access Supervision
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
R.T.F.
Applicant
S.L.R.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Family Law Custody/access / Application for Supervised Access (interim Order)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether supervised access is appropriate pending criminal proceedings
- 2 Whether supervised access would expose children M and R to risk of sexual impropriety
- 3 Whether proposed supervisor is adequate
Ratio Decidendi
Supervised access was necessary and appropriate because there was no reliable evidence of sexual abuse of M or R, Family and Children’s Services did not oppose supervised access, an experienced supervisor (Nicole Evans) was proposed and approved by the agency, the children had a prior beneficial relationship with the father, and supervised access appropriately balances the children's best interests by protecting them while preserving parental contact pending resolution of criminal charges.
Court Disposition
supervised access granted
Orders
- Supervised access granted to R.T.F.
- R.T.F. shall have one three-hour supervised access visit each week, scheduled with Nicole Evans and limited so as not to interfere with school attendance
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment