S. B. v. Canada Employment Insurance Commission
Leave to appeal is refused because the Applicant did not raise any question of law, fact or jurisdiction with a reasonable chance of success and the General Division properly applied the Faucher criteria in finding the Applicant was not available for work under s.18(a).
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2016 SSTADEI 126
- Parties
- Applicant: S. B.; Respondent: Canada Employment Insurance Commission
- Court
- Social Security Tribunal of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 7 March 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Insurance (ei) / Application for Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Availability for Work, Leave to Appeal, Faucher Criteria, Reasonable Chance of Success, Disentitlement Under S.18(a)
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
S. B.
Applicant
Canada Employment Insurance Commission
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Insurance (ei) / Application for Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Applicant was available for work under s.18(a) of the Employment Insurance Act
- 2 Whether the General Division erred in law, fact or jurisdiction in its decision
- 3 Whether the appeal has a reasonable chance of success to justify granting leave
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal is refused because the Applicant did not raise any question of law, fact or jurisdiction with a reasonable chance of success and the General Division properly applied the Faucher criteria in finding the Applicant was not available for work under s.18(a).
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal refused
Orders
- Leave to appeal refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment