S.G.R. v. R.J.R.
- Citation
- 2020 BCSC 39
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Decision
- 14 January 2020
- Posture
- Civil / Addendum to Reasons for Judgment
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Decision
- 14 January 2020
- Posture
- Civil / Addendum to Reasons for Judgment
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
Because the respondent abandoned his claim to allow pre-authorized payments to continue out of the business account, the application is dismissed.
Court disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- The respondent's application to allow pre-authorized payments to continue out of the business account is dismissed.
02
Material facts
Parties
S.G.R.
Claimant Counsel: L.S. AllanR.J.R.
Respondent Counsel: V.S.H. Park03
Procedural history
Posture
Civil / Addendum to Reasons for Judgment
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the respondent could continue pre-authorized payments from the business account
- 02
Effect of abandonment of the respondent's claim on the application
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Claimant opposed continuation of pre-authorized payments from the business account and sought their cessation.
- Respondent
- Respondent sought an order permitting continuation of pre-authorized payments from the business account but subsequently abandoned that claim.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Supreme Court of British Columbia (Murray J.), 2020 BCSC 39
Abandonment of a claim results in dismissal of the related application.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
Because the respondent abandoned his claim to allow pre-authorized payments to continue out of the business account, the application is dismissed.
Court disposition
Application dismissed
- The respondent's application to allow pre-authorized payments to continue out of the business account is dismissed.
Source and reliance status
Supreme Court of British Columbia · 14 January 2020
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Supreme Court of British Columbia
Judgment· 14 January 2020
2020 BCSC 39 S.G.R. v. R.J.R.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: S.G.R. v. R.J.R., 2020 BCSC 39 Date: 20200114 Docket: E192529 Registry: Vancouver Between: S.G.R. Claimant And: R.J.R. Respondent Before: The Honourable Madam Justice Murray Addendum to Reasons for Judgment Counsel for the Claimant: L.S. Allan Counsel for the Respondent: V.S.H. Park Place and Date of Hearing: Vancouver, B.C. November 6, 2019 Place and Date of Judgment: Vancouver, B.C. January 14, 2020 [1] This is an addendum to reasons for judgment issued November 22, 2019 and indexed as 2019 BCSC 2001. [2] The respondent has abandoned his claim to allow pre-authorized payments to continue out of the business account. Accordingly that application is dismissed. "The Honourable Madam Justice Murray"
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.