S. G. v. Minister of Employment and Social Development

S. G. v. Minister of Employment and Social Development

The application to extend time was refused because it was filed over six years after the Review Tribunal decision, the enabling statute limits extensions so that no application may be made more than one year after the decision was communicated, and the Appellant's reasons (concurrent litigation and stress) did not...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2015 SSTAD 952
Parties
Appellant: S. G.; Respondent: Minister of Employment and Social Development
Court
Social Security Tribunal of Canada
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
31 July 2015
Procedural Posture
Canada Pension Plan Disability Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal and Request for Extension of Time
Outcome
Application for leave to appeal refused
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal, Extension of Time, Limitation Period, Jurisdictional Limits of Tribunals, Canada Pension Plan Disability
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Social Security Law Statutory Interpretation Procedural Law Employment and Disability Benefits Leave to Appeal Extension of Time Limitation Period +2 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

S. G.

Appellant

Minister of Employment and Social Development

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Canada Pension Plan Disability Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal and Request for Extension of Time

  1. 1 Whether the Appeal Division should extend the time to apply for leave to appeal beyond the statutory limit
  2. 2 Whether the Appellant's reliance on concurrent workers' compensation proceedings and stress constitutes a valid ground to extend time
  3. 3 Whether the Appeal Division should grant leave to appeal (not considered after refusal to extend time)

Ratio Decidendi

The application to extend time was refused because it was filed over six years after the Review Tribunal decision, the enabling statute limits extensions so that no application may be made more than one year after the decision was communicated, and the Appellant's reasons (concurrent litigation and stress) did not satisfy the statutory requirement; because extension was refused the Appeal Division did not consider the merits of leave to appeal.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal refused

Orders

  • Request to extend time to file the application for leave to appeal refused
  • Application for leave to appeal refused