R. v. Mian
The court dismissed the appeal because it concluded that the trial judge made no errors reversible on appeal.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 1995 NSCA 191
- Parties
- Appellant: Sajjad Rasul Mian; Respondent: Her Majesty the Queen
- Court
- Nova Scotia Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 10 October 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Heard and Decided at Nova Scotia Court of Appeal; Appeal Dismissed on October 10, 1995
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence affirmed
- Legal Topics
- Conviction, Sentence, Appellate Review, Criminal Code S.127(1)
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sajjad Rasul Mian
Appellant
Her Majesty the Queen
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Heard and Decided at Nova Scotia Court of Appeal; Appeal Dismissed on October 10, 1995
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge made reversible errors of law or fact
- 2 Validity of the conviction under Criminal Code s.127(1)
- 3 Whether the sentence imposed was appropriate
Ratio Decidendi
The court dismissed the appeal because it concluded that the trial judge made no errors reversible on appeal.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence affirmed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed from conviction and sentence
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
R. v. Mian Court Court of Appeal Date 1995-10-10 Citation 1995 NSCA 191 Docket CAC 113865 Judge/Registrar/Adjudicator Chipman, David (Honourable Justice); Clarke, Lorne O. (Honourable Chief Justice); Hart, Gordon L.S. (Honourable Justice) Document Type Decision Decision Content C.A.C. No. 113865 NOVA SCOTIA COURT OF APPEAL Cite as: R. v. Mian, 1995 NSCA 191 Clarke, C.J.N.S.; Hart and Chipman, JJ.A. BETWEEN: SAJJAD RASUL MIAN ) Appellant in person ) Appellant ) - and - ) ) Robert E. Lutes, Q.C. ) for the Respondent HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN ) ) Respondent ) Appeal Heard: ) October 10, 1995 ) ) ) Judgment Delivered: ) October 10, 1995 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) THE COURT: Appeal dismissed from conviction (Criminal Code, s. 127(1)) and sentence, per oral reasons for judgment of Clarke, C.J.N.S.; Hart and Chipman, JJ.A. concurring. The reasons for judgment of the Court were delivered orally by: CLARKE, C.J.N.S.: After hearing and considering the motions and the issues that have been raised in this appeal, we have concluded that the Trial Judge made no errors reversible on appeal and accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. C.J.N.S. Concurred in: Hart, J. A. Chipman, J.A.