S.C. v. A.D.
On the evidence, including expert reports and trial testimony, equal shared parenting (50/50 residency) with joint custody and joint guardianship best serves the children’s interests because it reduces parental interactions that provoke conflict, supports each child’s therapeutic and educational needs when specified safeguards are imposed, and the father demonstrated sufficient capacity and cooperation for shared parenting; the plan includes specific terms (alternate weeks residency, therapy attendance, communication limits, common journal, monthly meetings) and gives the mother tie‑breaker decision‑making on major issues if parties cannot agree for one year subject to review and the...
- Citation
- 2009 BCSC 1084
- Parties
- Plaintiff: S.C.; Defendant: A.D.
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 10 August 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law Divorce and Parenting (custody/guardianship) / Trial Reasons/judgment on Parenting Plan
- Outcome
- Judgment awarding equal shared custody and joint guardianship with a detailed parenting plan and ancillary procedural directions
- Legal Topics
- Parenting Plan, Shared Parenting, Best Interests of the Child, Joint Custody, Decision‑making (joyce Model), Therapy Compliance and Administration
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
S.C.
Plaintiff
A.D.
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Family Law Divorce and Parenting (custody/guardianship) / Trial Reasons/judgment on Parenting Plan
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the appropriate parenting plan for the children?
- 2 Do child support payments arise from the plan and what amount?
- 3 Is the applicant entitled to spousal support and in what amount?
Ratio Decidendi
On the evidence, including expert reports and trial testimony, equal shared parenting (50/50 residency) with joint custody and joint guardianship best serves the children’s interests because it reduces parental interactions that provoke conflict, supports each child’s therapeutic and educational needs when specified safeguards are imposed, and the father demonstrated sufficient capacity and cooperation for shared parenting; the plan includes specific terms (alternate weeks residency, therapy attendance, communication limits, common journal, monthly meetings) and gives the mother tie‑breaker decision‑making on major issues if parties cannot agree for one year subject to review and the...
Court Disposition
Judgment awarding equal shared custody and joint guardianship with a detailed parenting plan and ancillary procedural directions
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment