Canada Judgment

Supreme Court of British Columbia

Scotia Mortgage Corporation v. Doan

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The master found the respondent did not satisfy the required test: the evidence did not establish sufficient equity in the property nor a reasonable prospect of payment of the outstanding amounts within a reasonable time; accordingly the order absolute was granted.

Court disposition

Order absolute granted in favour of the petitioner; no costs awarded.

Orders

  • Order absolute granted
  • No costs awarded

02

Material facts

Parties

Genworth Financial Mortgage Insurance Company

Petitioner Counsel: K. Locke (agent)

Scott Lawson Doan

Respondent

The Tenants of the Property

Respondents

Amounts and remedies

  • Outstanding Balance as at October 28, 2016: CAD 174,002.06
  • Appraised Market Value as at August 4, 2017: CAD 178,000

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Mortgage Enforcement / Foreclosure / Application for Order Absolute Following Order Nisi and Conduct of Sale

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Petitioner sought an order absolute. Outstanding indebtedness as of October 28, 2016 was $174,002.06 plus interest and costs. Conduct of sale was previously granted. Petitioner relied on the outstanding balance and the limited equity to support granting the order absolute.
Respondent
Respondent Doan, self-represented, argued the property had not been fully exposed to market because he felt it was not priced appropriately and that realtors had indicated a sale could achieve a higher price; an appraisal dated August 4, 2017 set market value at $178,000 and he relied on that evidence to contend there was sufficient equity or prospect of payment.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    2017 BCSC 2506 (Master Dick)

    A mortgagor seeking to avoid an order absolute must satisfy the same test as for an extension of the redemption period: show sufficient equity to fully satisfy outstanding obligations and a reasonable prospect of payment within a reasonable time.

  2. 02

    2017 BCSC 2506 (Master Dick)

    The onus is on the mortgagor to satisfy both requirements to defeat an order absolute.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The master found the respondent did not satisfy the required test: the evidence did not establish sufficient equity in the property nor a reasonable prospect of payment of the outstanding amounts within a reasonable time; accordingly the order absolute was granted.

Obiter and limits

  • The property had never been fully exposed to the market because the respondent declined to market it at the prices he was offered.
  • There will be no costs in the matter.

Court disposition

Order absolute granted in favour of the petitioner; no costs awarded.

  • Order absolute granted
  • No costs awarded

Source and reliance status

Supreme Court of British Columbia · 29 November 2017

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Supreme Court of British Columbia

Judgment· 29 November 2017

2017 BCSC 2506

2017 BCSC 2506 Scotia Mortgage Corporation v. Doan

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: Scotia Mortgage Corporation v. Doan, 2017 BCSC 2506 Date: 20171129 Docket: H21312 Registry: Port Alberni Between: Genworth Financial Mortgage Insurance Company Canada Petitioner And Scott Lawson Doan The Tenants of the Property Respondents Before: Master Dick Oral Reasons for Judgment In Chambers The Respondent S. Doan appearing on his own behalf: Counsel for the Petitioner: K. Locke (As agent) Place and Date of Trial/Hearing: Nanaimo, B.C. November 29, 2017 Place and Date of Judgment: Nanaimo, B.C. November 29, 2017 [1] THE COURT: This is the petitioner's application for an order absolute with respect to this matter. [2] The order nisi was granted in October 2016, with a two-month redemption period. Conduct of sale was granted to the petitioner in December 2016. The amount outstanding as at October 28, 2016 was $174,002.06 plus interest and costs. Unfortunately, the property has never been fully exposed to the market because Mr. Doan did not feel it was being priced appropriately. [3] What I am faced with is a recent appraisal that sets the market value of the property at $178,000 as of August 4, 2017. That is in keeping with what Mr. Doan's realtors had indicated could be achieved on a sale back in August, September 2016. [4] In order for me to dismiss the application for the order absolute in this matter, Mr. Doan must

satisfy the same test as if he was seeking an extension of the redemption period. That means he must satisfy me that, one, there is sufficient equity in the property to fully satisfy the obligations that are outstanding to the petitioner and, secondly, that there is a reasonable prospect of payment of those outstanding amounts. The onus is on Mr. Doan to satisfy both of those requirements. [5] I am not satisfied that, one, there is sufficient equity in this property to satisfy the obligations, nor two, that there is a reasonable prospect of payment of the outstanding amounts within a reasonable amount of time. [6] Therefore, I will grant the terms of the order sought, so the order absolute will go in this matter. There will be no costs of this matter. "Master Dick"

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.