Chinn v. Hanrieder
Because the respondents achieved substantial success on appeal (the trial finding of a contractual trust was upheld and a new trial ordered on third party claims), respondents are entitled to their trial and appeal costs from the appellant; the appellant is entitled to her costs of the appeal against the third parties; and the costs of the first trial between the appellant and the third parties are to be at the discretion of the trial judge at the new trial.
- Citation
- 2013 BCCA 413
- Parties
- Respondent (plaintiff): Bette Chinn; Respondent (plaintiff): Dennis Hanrieder; Appellant (defendant): Ingrid Hedwig Hanrieder; Respondent (third Party): Roderick E. Mont and Allin, Anderson, Mont & Walker; Respondent (third Party): Heath and Company
- Court
- British Columbia Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 27 September 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supplementary Reasons on Appeal Disposition and Costs; New Trial Ordered on Third Party Claims
- Outcome
- Respondents awarded trial and appeal costs against the appellant; appellant awarded costs of the appeal against the third parties; costs of the first trial between appellant and third parties are at the discretion of the trial judge after the new trial.
- Legal Topics
- Secret Trust, Contractual Trust, Third Party Claims, Costs of Appeal, New Trial
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bette Chinn
Respondent (plaintiff)
Dennis Hanrieder
Respondent (plaintiff)
Ingrid Hedwig Hanrieder
Appellant (defendant)
Roderick E. Mont and Allin, Anderson, Mont & Walker
Respondent (third Party)
Heath and Company
Respondent (third Party)
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supplementary Reasons on Appeal Disposition and Costs; New Trial Ordered on Third Party Claims
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a secret trust was established
- 2 Whether a contract between the parties created a trust
- 3 Whether respondents are entitled to trial and appeal costs against the appellant
Ratio Decidendi
Because the respondents achieved substantial success on appeal (the trial finding of a contractual trust was upheld and a new trial ordered on third party claims), respondents are entitled to their trial and appeal costs from the appellant; the appellant is entitled to her costs of the appeal against the third parties; and the costs of the first trial between the appellant and the third parties are to be at the discretion of the trial judge at the new trial.
Court Disposition
Respondents awarded trial and appeal costs against the appellant; appellant awarded costs of the appeal against the third parties; costs of the first trial between appellant and third parties are at the discretion of the trial judge after the new trial.
Orders
- Respondents shall have their trial and appeal costs against the appellant.
- The appellant shall have her costs of the appeal against the third parties.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment