Abbotsford (City) v. Shantz
Full indemnity and special costs were declined. DWS and Shantz achieved the principal 'event' (partial declaration under s.52 permitting overnight sheltering and s.7 breach for specified bylaw provisions) but the case did not meet the high Carter threshold for full indemnity nor the reprehensibility threshold for special costs. On the facts and complexity of the litigation the court awarded one set of costs for the successful parties in the DWS Action at Scale C of Appendix B increased to 1.5 times unit values, with reasonable disbursements, to be assessed by the Registrar; in the City Action costs were each party to bear their own costs.
- Citation
- 2016 BCSC 2437
- Parties
- Plaintiff (s156820); Defendant (s159480): City of Abbotsford; Plaintiff (s159480); Public Interest Litigant: British Columbia/Yukon Association of Drug War Survivors; Defendant (s156820); Co Applicant for Costs: Barry Shantz; Defendants: John Doe and Jane Doe and Other Persons Unknown Erecting, Constructing, Building or Occupying Tents, Shelters or Other Constructions on the Land Known as Jubilee Park, Abbotsford, British Columbia
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 30 December 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Consolidated Constitutional Challenge to Municipal Bylaws and Injunction Actions; Costs Application / Post Trial Costs Hearing and Supplementary Reasons (reasons for Judgment on Costs)
- Outcome
- Application for full indemnity costs and for special costs dismissed; award of increased costs granted to DWS and Shantz in the DWS Action; costs in the City Action reserved with each party to bear their own costs.
- Legal Topics
- Section 7 Charter, Public Interest Litigation, Costs Awards, Special Costs, Injunctions, Standing, Bylaw Enforcement, Homelessness Policy
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
City of Abbotsford
Plaintiff (s156820); Defendant (s159480)
British Columbia/Yukon Association of Drug War Survivors
Plaintiff (s159480); Public Interest Litigant
Barry Shantz
Defendant (s156820); Co Applicant for Costs
John Doe and Jane Doe and Other Persons Unknown Erecting, Constructing, Building or Occupying Tents, Shelters or Other Constructions on the Land Known as Jubilee Park, Abbotsford, British Columbia
Defendants
Procedural Posture
Consolidated Constitutional Challenge to Municipal Bylaws and Injunction Actions; Costs Application / Post Trial Costs Hearing and Supplementary Reasons (reasons for Judgment on Costs)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether impugned municipal bylaws violated s.7 (and s.2/s.15) of the Charter and should be declared of no force and effect
- 2 Whether DWS/Shantz qualified for full indemnity costs as public interest litigants under Carter/Okanagan
- 3 Whether special costs for reprehensible conduct by the City were warranted under Garcia
Ratio Decidendi
Full indemnity and special costs were declined. DWS and Shantz achieved the principal 'event' (partial declaration under s.52 permitting overnight sheltering and s.7 breach for specified bylaw provisions) but the case did not meet the high Carter threshold for full indemnity nor the reprehensibility threshold for special costs. On the facts and complexity of the litigation the court awarded one set of costs for the successful parties in the DWS Action at Scale C of Appendix B increased to 1.5 times unit values, with reasonable disbursements, to be assessed by the Registrar; in the City Action costs were each party to bear their own costs.
Court Disposition
Application for full indemnity costs and for special costs dismissed; award of increased costs granted to DWS and Shantz in the DWS Action; costs in the City Action reserved with each party to bear their own costs.
Orders
- Declined to award full indemnity costs to British Columbia/Yukon Association of Drug War Survivors and Barry Shantz
- Declined to award special costs against the City
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment