Blois v. Blois
Given the appellant's established failure to pay prior costs awards and refusal to return property despite court orders, the necessary "special circumstances" exist and, balancing the parties' interests, the court exercised its discretion to require security for costs in a conservative amount equal to 40% of the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2013 NSCA 39
- Parties
- Appellant/respondent: Steven Wade Blois; Respondent/applicant: Arden Memory Blois
- Court
- Nova Scotia Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 22 March 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce Appeal / Motion for Security for Costs Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- Motion granted.
- Legal Topics
- Security for Costs, Costs Awards, Compliance With Court Orders, Impecuniosity, Stay of Execution
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Steven Wade Blois
Appellant/respondent
Arden Memory Blois
Respondent/applicant
Procedural Posture
Divorce Appeal / Motion for Security for Costs Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to order security for costs pending appeal
- 2 Whether appellant's prior non-payment of costs and failure to return property constitute "special circumstances"
- 3 Appropriate quantum of security for costs
Ratio Decidendi
Given the appellant's established failure to pay prior costs awards and refusal to return property despite court orders, the necessary "special circumstances" exist and, balancing the parties' interests, the court exercised its discretion to require security for costs in a conservative amount equal to 40% of the trial costs award, $3,000, payable by a fixed date.
Court Disposition
Motion granted.
Orders
- Appellant shall pay security for costs in the amount of $3,000 into the Honourable Court on or before April 30, 2013.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment