Coulombe v. Société Cooperative Agricole de Montmorency
Majority held the testament created a real servitude benefiting the lower lands (the respondent's mills) which included the ancillary obligation to maintain the retenue and related works; that servitude attached to the retenue (which the appellant owned) and was enforceable against the appellant as successor in title; the appellant could not rely on the will's non-registration to deny a burden inherent in the title he asserts. Dissenting judges would have found only a personal obligation and/or lack of requisite certainty and formalities for a servitude.
- Citation
- [1950] SCR 313
- Parties
- Appellant / Defendant: J. A. Coulombe; Respondent / Plaintiff: La Société Coopérative Agricole De Montmorency
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 30 January 1950
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (property / Succession) / Supreme Court of Canada on Appeal From the Court of King's Bench, Province of Quebec
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Servitude, Will Interpretation, Registration of Title, Obligation to Repair, Servitude Upon Servitude
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
J. A. Coulombe
Appellant / Defendant
La Société Coopérative Agricole De Montmorency
Respondent / Plaintiff
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (property / Succession) / Supreme Court of Canada on Appeal From the Court of King's Bench, Province of Quebec
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the testament created a real servitude or only a personal obligation
- 2 Whether an obligation to repair a dam/power works can form part of a real servitude
- 3 Whether a servitude can be created upon a structure that itself rests upon rights of others (servitude upon servitude)
Ratio Decidendi
Majority held the testament created a real servitude benefiting the lower lands (the respondent's mills) which included the ancillary obligation to maintain the retenue and related works; that servitude attached to the retenue (which the appellant owned) and was enforceable against the appellant as successor in title; the appellant could not rely on the will's non-registration to deny a burden inherent in the title he asserts. Dissenting judges would have found only a personal obligation and/or lack of requisite certainty and formalities for a servitude.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment