R. v. Fidgen
Viewing the video and circumstances objectively, the Crown proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused intentionally reached out and touched the complainant's buttocks and that the touching was done in a sexual manner, satisfying the elements of sexual interference (s.151) and sexual assault (s.271).
- Citation
- 2026 NSPC 2
- Parties
- Crown: His Majesty the King; Accused: Cole Fidgen
- Court
- Nova Scotia Provincial Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 16 January 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Trial Decision (guilty Verdict)
- Outcome
- Accused found guilty of sexual interference (s.151) and sexual assault (s.271); pleaded guilty to resisting arrest (s.129) and breach of probation (s.733.1(1)).
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Interference, Sexual Assault, Mens Rea, Actus Reus, Publication Ban, Video Surveillance, Breach of Probation, Resisting Arrest
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
His Majesty the King
Crown
Cole Fidgen
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Trial Decision (guilty Verdict)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the touching was intentional
- 2 Whether the touching was for a sexual purpose
- 3 Whether the Crown proved actus reus and mens rea for sexual interference (s.151) and sexual assault (s.271) beyond a reasonable doubt
Ratio Decidendi
Viewing the video and circumstances objectively, the Crown proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused intentionally reached out and touched the complainant's buttocks and that the touching was done in a sexual manner, satisfying the elements of sexual interference (s.151) and sexual assault (s.271).
Court Disposition
Accused found guilty of sexual interference (s.151) and sexual assault (s.271); pleaded guilty to resisting arrest (s.129) and breach of probation (s.733.1(1)).
Orders
- Convictions entered for sexual interference (Criminal Code s.151) and sexual assault (Criminal Code s.271).
- Convictions entered on guilty pleas for resisting arrest (Criminal Code s.129) and breach of probation (Criminal Code s.733.1(1)).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment