Yekrangian v. Boys

Yekrangian v. Boys

Respondents were awarded specified costs for two pre-hearing motions (the agreed $1,000 for the motion to expedite and $7,000 for the motion to introduce fresh evidence) because the court found entitlement to those awards; given divided success on the appeal, each party must bear its own costs of the appeal; the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2021 ONCA 777
Parties
Appellant: Seyedehzahra Delnaz Yekrangian; Appellant: Elle Hariri Cameron; Respondent: Christopher Allan Boys; Respondent: Kristy Anne Boys; Respondent: Stefan Brogren
Court
Court of Appeal for Ontario
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
1 November 2021
Procedural Posture
Civil / Post Appeal Costs Submissions in Court of Appeal
Outcome
Respondents awarded costs for two pre-hearing motions; parties to bear their own costs of the appeal; lower court costs order not disturbed.
Legal Topics
Costs on Motions, Allocation of Appeal Costs, Fresh Evidence on Appeal, Motions to Expedite
Source Language
en
Civil Litigation Costs Appellate Procedure Evidence Costs on Motions Allocation of Appeal Costs Fresh Evidence on Appeal Motions to Expedite

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Seyedehzahra Delnaz Yekrangian

Appellant

Elle Hariri Cameron

Appellant

Christopher Allan Boys

Respondent

Kristy Anne Boys

Respondent

Stefan Brogren

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil / Post Appeal Costs Submissions in Court of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether respondents were entitled to costs for two pre-hearing motions
  2. 2 How costs of the appeal should be allocated given divided success
  3. 3 Whether to disturb the lower court costs order

Ratio Decidendi

Respondents were awarded specified costs for two pre-hearing motions (the agreed $1,000 for the motion to expedite and $7,000 for the motion to introduce fresh evidence) because the court found entitlement to those awards; given divided success on the appeal, each party must bear its own costs of the appeal; the lower court costs order was left undisturbed because the appellants' partial success on a particular issue was based on an argument not advanced below.

Court Disposition

Respondents awarded costs for two pre-hearing motions; parties to bear their own costs of the appeal; lower court costs order not disturbed.

Orders

  • Respondents awarded $1,000 for the Motion to Expedite the Appeal, inclusive of disbursements and HST
  • Respondents awarded $7,000 for the Motion to Introduce Fresh Evidence, inclusive of disbursements and HST