Legere v. Cole

Legere v. Cole

The court found a material change in circumstances affecting the child but declined to grant sole custody or a 50/50 shared parenting order; instead it modified the existing parenting schedule (maintaining the weekly pattern but expanding father's holiday and summer time in specified blocks), ordered prospective child support of $495 per month commencing January 1, 2015, awarded retroactive child support at $546 per month effective March 2014 with a retroactive total to May 2015 of $7,935 (credit for any table amount paid), directed proportionate sharing of future section 7 expenses and child care costs, imposed restrictions and monitoring on grandparent contact while in father's care,...

Citation
2015 NSSC 148
Parties
Applicant (father): Phillip Legere; Respondent (mother): Jenny Cole
Court
Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
15 May 2015
Procedural Posture
Family Division Parenting and Child Support Variation / Final Decision
Outcome
Application for sole custody denied; application amended to shared parenting not granted; parenting schedule varied with specific expansion of holiday and summer time for father; prospective and retroactive child support ordered; orders on section 7 expense sharing, counselling, grandparent contact, tax...
Legal Topics
Shared Parenting, Parenting Schedule Variation, Retroactive Child Support, Section 7 Expenses, Grandparent Contact, Counselling, Corporal Punishment, Tax Dependency Claim
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Phillip Legere

Applicant (father)

Jenny Cole

Respondent (mother)

Procedural Posture

Family Division Parenting and Child Support Variation / Final Decision

  1. 1 Whether there has been a material change in circumstances warranting variation of the parenting schedule
  2. 2 Whether sole or shared custody is appropriate
  3. 3 Whether retroactive child support should be awarded and the appropriate effective date and amount

Ratio Decidendi

The court found a material change in circumstances affecting the child but declined to grant sole custody or a 50/50 shared parenting order; instead it modified the existing parenting schedule (maintaining the weekly pattern but expanding father's holiday and summer time in specified blocks), ordered prospective child support of $495 per month commencing January 1, 2015, awarded retroactive child support at $546 per month effective March 2014 with a retroactive total to May 2015 of $7,935 (credit for any table amount paid), directed proportionate sharing of future section 7 expenses and child care costs, imposed restrictions and monitoring on grandparent contact while in father's care,...

Court Disposition

Application for sole custody denied; application amended to shared parenting not granted; parenting schedule varied with specific expansion of holiday and summer time for father; prospective and retroactive child support ordered; orders on section 7 expense sharing, counselling, grandparent contact, tax...

Orders

  • Sole custody denied; maintain existing weekly parenting pattern (approx. 5 overnights per 14‑day period, father ~35%, mother ~65%) with modifications: father may extend weekends to include Friday or Monday of long weekends/holidays; father entitled to one half of March break, one half of Easter (alternating years),...
  • Prospective child support: Applicant to pay $495 per month commencing January 1, 2015, payable on the 1st of each month through Maintenance Enforcement until further order.