Shaw Communications Inc. v. Canada (Minister of National Revenue)

Shaw Communications Inc. v. Canada (Minister of National Revenue)

The trial judge's factual findings that the individuals were employees were supported by evidence; the issues raised were factual in nature and involved permissible inferences. No reviewable error of law was identified. Therefore the appellate court must not re-weigh the evidence and the application is dismissed.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2003 FCA 171
Parties
Applicant: Shaw Communications Inc.; Respondent: The Minister of National Revenue
Court
Federal Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
1 April 2003
Procedural Posture
Application Under the Federal Court Act, Tax Court of Canada Act, Employment Insurance Act and Canada Pension Plan / Federal Court of Appeal Judgment on Application
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Employee Versus Independent Contractor, Judicial Review, Standard of Review, Costs
Source Language
en
Employment Law Tax Law Administrative Law Social Security Law Employee Versus Independent Contractor Judicial Review Standard of Review Costs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Shaw Communications Inc.

Applicant

The Minister of National Revenue

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application Under the Federal Court Act, Tax Court of Canada Act, Employment Insurance Act and Canada Pension Plan / Federal Court of Appeal Judgment on Application

  1. 1 Whether the individuals were employees or independent contractors
  2. 2 Whether the trial judge (Mogan, J.) committed a reviewable error of law in finding employment status
  3. 3 Whether the appellate court may re-weigh findings of fact and inferences of the trial judge

Ratio Decidendi

The trial judge's factual findings that the individuals were employees were supported by evidence; the issues raised were factual in nature and involved permissible inferences. No reviewable error of law was identified. Therefore the appellate court must not re-weigh the evidence and the application is dismissed.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • Application dismissed
  • Costs awarded as agreed of $2,250.00 inclusive of disbursements