R v. Lynch

R v. Lynch

The Crown failed to meet its burden beyond a reasonable doubt because material inconsistencies and reliability concerns in the complainant's evidence left a reasonable doubt as to whether the offences were committed; accordingly the accused was not convicted.

Citation
2022 NSPC 44
Parties
Crown: His Majesty the King; Defendant: Shawn Lynch
Court
Nova Scotia Provincial Court
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
30 November 2022
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Judgment After Trial
Outcome
Not guilty (acquittal); offences not proven beyond a reasonable doubt
Legal Topics
Sexual Assault, Sexual Interference, Position of Authority, Credibility and Reliability of Witnesses, Burden of Proof, Presumption of Innocence, Reasonable Doubt
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 16 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

His Majesty the King

Crown

Shawn Lynch

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Judgment After Trial

  1. 1 Whether the Crown proved sexual assault beyond a reasonable doubt
  2. 2 Whether the Crown proved sexual interference beyond a reasonable doubt
  3. 3 Whether the s.153 position of authority offence was established

Ratio Decidendi

The Crown failed to meet its burden beyond a reasonable doubt because material inconsistencies and reliability concerns in the complainant's evidence left a reasonable doubt as to whether the offences were committed; accordingly the accused was not convicted.

Court Disposition

Not guilty (acquittal); offences not proven beyond a reasonable doubt

Orders

  • Accused found not guilty and acquitted
  • Crown conceded offence under s.153 Criminal Code not made out