National Bank Financial Ltd. v. Potter; Barthe v. National Bank Financial Ltd.; 1384156 Ontario Ltd. v. National Bank Financial Ltd.
NBFL improperly adopted a process that led to access and review of solicitor-client privileged materials on KHI servers; the circumstances were rare and exceptional and caused wasted expense and risk to proper administration of justice, therefore the court exercised its discretion under the Civil Procedure Rules to...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2005 NSSC 264
- Parties
- Plaintiff and Defendant by Counterclaim: National Bank Financial Ltd.; Applicant; Defendant and Plaintiff by Counterclaim: Daniel Potter; Defendant; Plaintiff by Counterclaim: Raymond Courtney; Defendant and Defendant by Counterclaim: Blois Colpitts; Defendant and Defendant by Counterclaim: Stewart McKelvey Stirling Scales; Plaintiff and Defendant by Counterclaim: Michael Barthe; Plaintiff and Defendant by Counterclaim: Lutz Ristow; Plaintiff (keating Company): 1384156 Ontario Inc.
- Court
- Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 23 September 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Litigation Interlocutory Applications Regarding Solicitor Client Privilege and Costs / Post Hearing Costs Application Following Interlocutory Privilege Hearings
- Outcome
- Costs awarded to multiple applicants against National Bank Financial Ltd.; awards made as lump sums payable forthwith and not in the cause; no costs awarded against Raymond Courtney or his counsel; costs between Potter and Courtney remain in the cause.
- Legal Topics
- Solicitor Client Privilege, Costs Awards, Electronic Disclosure, Counsel Disqualification
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
National Bank Financial Ltd.
Plaintiff and Defendant by Counterclaim
Daniel Potter
Applicant; Defendant and Plaintiff by Counterclaim
Raymond Courtney
Defendant; Plaintiff by Counterclaim
Blois Colpitts
Defendant and Defendant by Counterclaim
Stewart McKelvey Stirling Scales
Defendant and Defendant by Counterclaim
Michael Barthe
Plaintiff and Defendant by Counterclaim
Lutz Ristow
Plaintiff and Defendant by Counterclaim
1384156 Ontario Inc.
Plaintiff (keating Company)
Procedural Posture
Civil Litigation Interlocutory Applications Regarding Solicitor Client Privilege and Costs / Post Hearing Costs Application Following Interlocutory Privilege Hearings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether NBFL improperly accessed and used solicitor-client privileged documents
- 2 Whether and to whom costs should be awarded for the privilege litigation
- 3 Appropriate form and quantum of costs (tariff, lump sum, solicitor-and-client)
Ratio Decidendi
NBFL improperly adopted a process that led to access and review of solicitor-client privileged materials on KHI servers; the circumstances were rare and exceptional and caused wasted expense and risk to proper administration of justice, therefore the court exercised its discretion under the Civil Procedure Rules to award substantial lump-sum costs (above tariff) to the Potter group and other affected parties as compensation and deterrence, payable forthwith and not in the cause, with differing quantum reflecting degree of involvement and success.
Court Disposition
Costs awarded to multiple applicants against National Bank Financial Ltd.; awards made as lump sums payable forthwith and not in the cause; no costs awarded against Raymond Courtney or his counsel; costs between Potter and Courtney remain in the cause.
Orders
- Awarded to the Potter group (Daniel Potter, Knowledge House Inc., Starr's Point Capital Inc.): $70,000 inclusive of disbursements, payable forthwith and not in the cause
- Awarded to Blois Colpitts: $125,000 inclusive of disbursements, payable forthwith and not in the cause
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment