Ai Kang Yi Yuan Enterprises Corp. v. 1098586 B.C. Ltd.
The December 5, 2016 document evidenced an objective intention by the signatories to form a binding contract to value and convert Dr. Wang's contributions (including deposits and Lot 15) into LP7 units; its essential terms were sufficiently certain; control/share structure of GP7 was not an essential term or...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2022 BCSC 1416
- Parties
- Plaintiff (s1812818); Defendant (s194361): Ai Kang Yi Yuan Enterprises Corp.; Defendant (s1812818); Defendant in Deposit Action: 1098586 B.C. Ltd.; Plaintiff (s194361) / General Partner (fund 7): AK (007) GP Management Ltd.; Plaintiff (s194361) / Limited Partnership (fund 7): AK 007 Limited Partnership; Defendant (s194361) / Individual Controlling Mind of AK Entities: Wang Dong; Defendant (s194361) / Title Holder of Lot 15: 1072709 B.C. Ltd.
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 17 August 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Real Property, Partnership, Contract and Equitable Claims / Trial Judgment (reasons for Judgment)
- Outcome
- Partnership plaintiffs' claim for specific performance granted in part; Deposit Action dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Specific Performance, Resulting Trust, Constructive Trust, Formation of Contract, Condition Precedent, Pre Contractual Agreements, Foreign Buyers' Tax
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ai Kang Yi Yuan Enterprises Corp.
Plaintiff (s1812818); Defendant (s194361)
1098586 B.C. Ltd.
Defendant (s1812818); Defendant in Deposit Action
AK (007) GP Management Ltd.
Plaintiff (s194361) / General Partner (fund 7)
AK 007 Limited Partnership
Plaintiff (s194361) / Limited Partnership (fund 7)
Wang Dong
Defendant (s194361) / Individual Controlling Mind of AK Entities
1072709 B.C. Ltd.
Defendant (s194361) / Title Holder of Lot 15
Procedural Posture
Civil Real Property, Partnership, Contract and Equitable Claims / Trial Judgment (reasons for Judgment)
Legal Issues
- 1 Was the December 5, 2016 document a binding contract?
- 2 Were the essential terms sufficiently certain?
- 3 Was control of the partnership by Dr. Wang (through AKC) an express or implied condition precedent?
Ratio Decidendi
The December 5, 2016 document evidenced an objective intention by the signatories to form a binding contract to value and convert Dr. Wang's contributions (including deposits and Lot 15) into LP7 units; its essential terms were sufficiently certain; control/share structure of GP7 was not an essential term or condition precedent; specific performance ordering transfer of Lot 15 (or equivalent effect) was appropriate because Lot 15 is essential to the land assembly.
Court Disposition
Partnership plaintiffs' claim for specific performance granted in part; Deposit Action dismissed.
Orders
- Deposit Action dismissed
- Specific performance: Partnership entitled to transfer of Lot 15 to the Partnership (remedy to be implemented by further application to determine mechanism and timelines)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment