Ball v. Gutschenritter
The majority held that under s.60 of the Saskatchewan Land Titles Act purchasers are imputed with knowledge that registered titles derived from Crown grants are subject to typical statutory reservations, and therefore the vendor was under no obligation to warn the purchaser about such usual reservations; consequently the purchaser's acceptance-of-title clause and his failure to inquire precluded his objection and specific performance was ordered (appeal dismissed).
- Citation
- [1925] SCR 68
- Parties
- Appellant (defendant): George Ball; Respondent (plaintiff): Philip P. Gutschenritter; Respondent (plaintiff): Unnamed Co-Plaintiff
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 9 December 1924
- Procedural Posture
- Specific Performance of Sale of Land / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs; judgment of Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan affirmed; respondents' action for specific performance upheld
- Legal Topics
- Specific Performance, Vendor's Duty of Disclosure, Title Defects, Land Titles Act S.60, Reservations in Crown Grants
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
George Ball
Appellant (defendant)
Philip P. Gutschenritter
Respondent (plaintiff)
Unnamed Co-Plaintiff
Respondent (plaintiff)
Procedural Posture
Specific Performance of Sale of Land / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether vendor must disclose reservations in original Crown grants affecting title
- 2 Whether purchaser's acceptance of vendor's title precludes objection to title defects
- 3 Effect and scope of Saskatchewan Land Titles Act s.60 on parties' knowledge of reservations
Ratio Decidendi
The majority held that under s.60 of the Saskatchewan Land Titles Act purchasers are imputed with knowledge that registered titles derived from Crown grants are subject to typical statutory reservations, and therefore the vendor was under no obligation to warn the purchaser about such usual reservations; consequently the purchaser's acceptance-of-title clause and his failure to inquire precluded his objection and specific performance was ordered (appeal dismissed).
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs; judgment of Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan affirmed; respondents' action for specific performance upheld
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Judgment of the Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan affirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment