Canadian Pacific Ry. Co. v. S.S. Storstad
Majority held s.503 of the Merchant Shipping Act 1894 governs distribution of proceeds of sale even if the shipowner did not apply to invoke limitation; the proceeds are a part realization of the statutory liability and must be apportioned 7/15 to loss of life/personal injury claims and 8/15 to property claims, with life claimants also ranking pari passu for any unsatisfied balances on the latter fund. A dissent held s.503 is operative only upon the owner's application under s.504.
- Citation
- (1918) 56 SCR 324
- Parties
- Appellant/plaintiff: Canadian Pacific Railway Company; Defendant: S.S. Storstad; Respondents/claimants: The Ætna Insurance Company and Others
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 11 March 1918
- Procedural Posture
- Admiralty Collision Action in Rem / On Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Exchequer Court of Canada, Quebec Admiralty Division
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; judgment of Exchequer Court varied to direct distribution in accordance with s.503; cross-appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Collision, Limitation of Shipowners' Liability, Distribution of Proceeds of Sale, Priority Between Life and Property Claims, Statutory Interpretation
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Canadian Pacific Railway Company
Appellant/plaintiff
S.S. Storstad
Defendant
The Ætna Insurance Company and Others
Respondents/claimants
Procedural Posture
Admiralty Collision Action in Rem / On Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Exchequer Court of Canada, Quebec Admiralty Division
Legal Issues
- 1 Does s.503 of the Imperial Merchant Shipping Act 1894 govern distribution of proceeds of sale of a liable ship where the owner has not invoked limitation?
- 2 Do claimants for loss of life or personal injury have priority over property claimants when the defendant ship's realized fund is insufficient?
- 3 If s.503 applies, how must the fund be apportioned and how do life claims rank for any unsatisfied balances?
Ratio Decidendi
Majority held s.503 of the Merchant Shipping Act 1894 governs distribution of proceeds of sale even if the shipowner did not apply to invoke limitation; the proceeds are a part realization of the statutory liability and must be apportioned 7/15 to loss of life/personal injury claims and 8/15 to property claims, with life claimants also ranking pari passu for any unsatisfied balances on the latter fund. A dissent held s.503 is operative only upon the owner's application under s.504.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; judgment of Exchequer Court varied to direct distribution in accordance with s.503; cross-appeal dismissed.
Orders
- Vary judgment of Exchequer Court and remit matter to deputy registrar for further inquiry and report.
- Apportion the fund in court so that 7/15 of the fund is reserved exclusively for claimants for loss of life or personal injury and the remaining 8/15 forms a fund for property claims with life claimants ranking pari passu for any unsatisfied balances.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment