Canadian Pacific Ry. Co. v. S.S. Storstad

Canadian Pacific Ry. Co. v. S.S. Storstad

Majority held s.503 of the Merchant Shipping Act 1894 governs distribution of proceeds of sale even if the shipowner did not apply to invoke limitation; the proceeds are a part realization of the statutory liability and must be apportioned 7/15 to loss of life/personal injury claims and 8/15 to property claims, with life claimants also ranking pari passu for any unsatisfied balances on the latter fund. A dissent held s.503 is operative only upon the owner's application under s.504.

Citation
(1918) 56 SCR 324
Parties
Appellant/plaintiff: Canadian Pacific Railway Company; Defendant: S.S. Storstad; Respondents/claimants: The Ætna Insurance Company and Others
Court
Supreme Court of Canada
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
11 March 1918
Procedural Posture
Admiralty Collision Action in Rem / On Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Exchequer Court of Canada, Quebec Admiralty Division
Outcome
Appeal allowed in part; judgment of Exchequer Court varied to direct distribution in accordance with s.503; cross-appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
Collision, Limitation of Shipowners' Liability, Distribution of Proceeds of Sale, Priority Between Life and Property Claims, Statutory Interpretation
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Canadian Pacific Railway Company

Appellant/plaintiff

S.S. Storstad

Defendant

The Ætna Insurance Company and Others

Respondents/claimants

Procedural Posture

Admiralty Collision Action in Rem / On Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Exchequer Court of Canada, Quebec Admiralty Division

  1. 1 Does s.503 of the Imperial Merchant Shipping Act 1894 govern distribution of proceeds of sale of a liable ship where the owner has not invoked limitation?
  2. 2 Do claimants for loss of life or personal injury have priority over property claimants when the defendant ship's realized fund is insufficient?
  3. 3 If s.503 applies, how must the fund be apportioned and how do life claims rank for any unsatisfied balances?

Ratio Decidendi

Majority held s.503 of the Merchant Shipping Act 1894 governs distribution of proceeds of sale even if the shipowner did not apply to invoke limitation; the proceeds are a part realization of the statutory liability and must be apportioned 7/15 to loss of life/personal injury claims and 8/15 to property claims, with life claimants also ranking pari passu for any unsatisfied balances on the latter fund. A dissent held s.503 is operative only upon the owner's application under s.504.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed in part; judgment of Exchequer Court varied to direct distribution in accordance with s.503; cross-appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • Vary judgment of Exchequer Court and remit matter to deputy registrar for further inquiry and report.
  • Apportion the fund in court so that 7/15 of the fund is reserved exclusively for claimants for loss of life or personal injury and the remaining 8/15 forms a fund for property claims with life claimants ranking pari passu for any unsatisfied balances.