S.St.C. v. S.C.
Although the Director has statutory standing to participate in adoption proceedings, a non-party seeking to appeal requires the Court's discretion to grant leave unless the statute expressly confers an appeal as of right; where children are involved the primary factors are the nature of the applicant's interest and the child's best interests; leave was refused because the Director's office had directed the adoptive parents to proceed privately, the proposed appeal would harm the child's best interests, would not address internal administrative failings that caused the problem, and would constitute an abuse of process.
- Citation
- 2017 YKCA 7
- Parties
- Adoptive Parent / Petitioner: S.St.C.; Adoptive Parent / Petitioner: C.C.; Respondent / Natural Parent: S.C.; Respondent / Natural Parent: S.P.; Applicant / Appellant: Director of Family and Children's Services
- Court
- Yukon Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 15 June 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal and Application for Leave to Set Aside Adoption Order / Court of Appeal Decision on Application for Leave to Appeal (leave Refused)
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Standing, Leave to Appeal for Non Parties, Best Interests of the Child, Statutory Interpretation, Abuse of Process
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
S.St.C.
Adoptive Parent / Petitioner
C.C.
Adoptive Parent / Petitioner
S.C.
Respondent / Natural Parent
S.P.
Respondent / Natural Parent
Director of Family and Children's Services
Applicant / Appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal and Application for Leave to Set Aside Adoption Order / Court of Appeal Decision on Application for Leave to Appeal (leave Refused)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Director has standing to appear and appeal
- 2 Whether a non-party Director has an automatic right of appeal or requires leave
- 3 What factors govern leave where a non-party seeks to appeal involving a child
Ratio Decidendi
Although the Director has statutory standing to participate in adoption proceedings, a non-party seeking to appeal requires the Court's discretion to grant leave unless the statute expressly confers an appeal as of right; where children are involved the primary factors are the nature of the applicant's interest and the child's best interests; leave was refused because the Director's office had directed the adoptive parents to proceed privately, the proposed appeal would harm the child's best interests, would not address internal administrative failings that caused the problem, and would constitute an abuse of process.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal refused
Orders
- Leave to appeal refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment