R. v. Francis
Applicants from Acadia Band (Marilyn Francis and Peter Louis Francis) presented sufficient evidence of proximity, community practices and attempts to obtain funding to give their Aboriginal/Treaty defence an air of reality and to show they exhausted alternatives; fairness required state-funded counsel and a stay pending appointment. Applicants from Indian Brook failed to demonstrate sufficient evidentiary link to fish the waters in question and thus failed the air of reality threshold; Aboriginal defences are irrelevant to obstruction charges, so state-funded counsel was not required for those charges.
- Citation
- 2007 NSPC 28
- Parties
- Crown: Her Majesty The Queen; Applicant/defendant: Marilyn Francis; Applicant/defendant: Peter Louis Francis; Applicant/defendant: Marcel Marr; Applicant/defendant: Derrick William Nevin; Applicant/defendant: Jerome Patrick Paul; Applicant/defendant: Peter Allan Paul; Applicant/defendant: Leander Phillip Paul; Applicant/defendant: Stephen Peter Paul; Applicant/defendant: Leon Russell Robinson
- Court
- Nova Scotia Provincial Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 3 April 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Regulatory/fisheries Offences / Pre Trial Application for State Funded Counsel Decision
- Outcome
- Partial grant and partial denial: state-funded counsel and stay ordered for Acadia applicants (Marilyn Francis and Peter Louis Francis); applications denied for Indian Brook applicants and for obstruction charges where Aboriginal defence irrelevant.
- Legal Topics
- State Funded Counsel, Aboriginal/treaty Fishing Rights, Charter Ss.7 and 11, Obstruction of a Fishery Officer S.62 Fisheries Act, Air of Reality Test, Stay of Proceedings
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty The Queen
Crown
Marilyn Francis
Applicant/defendant
Peter Louis Francis
Applicant/defendant
Marcel Marr
Applicant/defendant
Derrick William Nevin
Applicant/defendant
Jerome Patrick Paul
Applicant/defendant
Peter Allan Paul
Applicant/defendant
Leander Phillip Paul
Applicant/defendant
Stephen Peter Paul
Applicant/defendant
Leon Russell Robinson
Applicant/defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Regulatory/fisheries Offences / Pre Trial Application for State Funded Counsel Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether state-funded trial counsel is required to ensure a fair trial under ss.7 and 11 of the Charter
- 2 Whether proposed Aboriginal/Treaty defence is relevant to obstruction charges (s.62)
- 3 Whether the applicants have established an air of reality to their Aboriginal/Treaty defence
Ratio Decidendi
Applicants from Acadia Band (Marilyn Francis and Peter Louis Francis) presented sufficient evidence of proximity, community practices and attempts to obtain funding to give their Aboriginal/Treaty defence an air of reality and to show they exhausted alternatives; fairness required state-funded counsel and a stay pending appointment. Applicants from Indian Brook failed to demonstrate sufficient evidentiary link to fish the waters in question and thus failed the air of reality threshold; Aboriginal defences are irrelevant to obstruction charges, so state-funded counsel was not required for those charges.
Court Disposition
Partial grant and partial denial: state-funded counsel and stay ordered for Acadia applicants (Marilyn Francis and Peter Louis Francis); applications denied for Indian Brook applicants and for obstruction charges where Aboriginal defence irrelevant.
Orders
- Stay of proceedings entered for Marilyn Francis pending appointment of state-funded trial counsel
- Stay of proceedings entered for Peter Louis Francis pending appointment of state-funded trial counsel
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment