R. v. Francis

R. v. Francis

Applicants from Acadia Band (Marilyn Francis and Peter Louis Francis) presented sufficient evidence of proximity, community practices and attempts to obtain funding to give their Aboriginal/Treaty defence an air of reality and to show they exhausted alternatives; fairness required state-funded counsel and a stay pending appointment. Applicants from Indian Brook failed to demonstrate sufficient evidentiary link to fish the waters in question and thus failed the air of reality threshold; Aboriginal defences are irrelevant to obstruction charges, so state-funded counsel was not required for those charges.

Citation
2007 NSPC 28
Parties
Crown: Her Majesty The Queen; Applicant/defendant: Marilyn Francis; Applicant/defendant: Peter Louis Francis; Applicant/defendant: Marcel Marr; Applicant/defendant: Derrick William Nevin; Applicant/defendant: Jerome Patrick Paul; Applicant/defendant: Peter Allan Paul; Applicant/defendant: Leander Phillip Paul; Applicant/defendant: Stephen Peter Paul; Applicant/defendant: Leon Russell Robinson
Court
Nova Scotia Provincial Court
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
3 April 2007
Procedural Posture
Criminal Regulatory/fisheries Offences / Pre Trial Application for State Funded Counsel Decision
Outcome
Partial grant and partial denial: state-funded counsel and stay ordered for Acadia applicants (Marilyn Francis and Peter Louis Francis); applications denied for Indian Brook applicants and for obstruction charges where Aboriginal defence irrelevant.
Legal Topics
State Funded Counsel, Aboriginal/treaty Fishing Rights, Charter Ss.7 and 11, Obstruction of a Fishery Officer S.62 Fisheries Act, Air of Reality Test, Stay of Proceedings
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 29 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 10
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Her Majesty The Queen

Crown

Marilyn Francis

Applicant/defendant

Peter Louis Francis

Applicant/defendant

Marcel Marr

Applicant/defendant

Derrick William Nevin

Applicant/defendant

Jerome Patrick Paul

Applicant/defendant

Peter Allan Paul

Applicant/defendant

Leander Phillip Paul

Applicant/defendant

Stephen Peter Paul

Applicant/defendant

Leon Russell Robinson

Applicant/defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Regulatory/fisheries Offences / Pre Trial Application for State Funded Counsel Decision

  1. 1 Whether state-funded trial counsel is required to ensure a fair trial under ss.7 and 11 of the Charter
  2. 2 Whether proposed Aboriginal/Treaty defence is relevant to obstruction charges (s.62)
  3. 3 Whether the applicants have established an air of reality to their Aboriginal/Treaty defence

Ratio Decidendi

Applicants from Acadia Band (Marilyn Francis and Peter Louis Francis) presented sufficient evidence of proximity, community practices and attempts to obtain funding to give their Aboriginal/Treaty defence an air of reality and to show they exhausted alternatives; fairness required state-funded counsel and a stay pending appointment. Applicants from Indian Brook failed to demonstrate sufficient evidentiary link to fish the waters in question and thus failed the air of reality threshold; Aboriginal defences are irrelevant to obstruction charges, so state-funded counsel was not required for those charges.

Court Disposition

Partial grant and partial denial: state-funded counsel and stay ordered for Acadia applicants (Marilyn Francis and Peter Louis Francis); applications denied for Indian Brook applicants and for obstruction charges where Aboriginal defence irrelevant.

Orders

  • Stay of proceedings entered for Marilyn Francis pending appointment of state-funded trial counsel
  • Stay of proceedings entered for Peter Louis Francis pending appointment of state-funded trial counsel