TA2-04125
Claimants failed to establish nexus to a Convention ground and failed to prove state protection was unavailable; generalized criminal violence does not constitute persecution and identified incidents received police response, therefore the claimants are not Convention refugees nor persons in need of protection.
- Citation
- TA2-04125
- Parties
- Claimant: XXXXXXXXXXXXX; Claimant: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX; Claimant: XXXXXXXXXX; Claimant: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
- Court
- Refugee Protection Division
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 11 December 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Refugee Protection Claim / Final Decision After Oral Hearing
- Outcome
- Claims dismissed; claimants are not Convention refugees nor persons in need of protection.
- Legal Topics
- State Protection, Nexus to Convention Grounds, Generalized Risk, Delay and Re Availment, Credibility, Risk to Life, Cruel and Unusual Treatment, Convention Against Torture
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XXXXXXXXXXXXX
Claimant
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Claimant
XXXXXXXXXX
Claimant
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Claimant
Procedural Posture
Refugee Protection Claim / Final Decision After Oral Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 identity
- 2 nexus
- 3 delay
Ratio Decidendi
Claimants failed to establish nexus to a Convention ground and failed to prove state protection was unavailable; generalized criminal violence does not constitute persecution and identified incidents received police response, therefore the claimants are not Convention refugees nor persons in need of protection.
Court Disposition
Claims dismissed; claimants are not Convention refugees nor persons in need of protection.
Orders
- Refugee Protection Division determination dated December 11, 2002: claims denied
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment