Yukon (Government of) v. Norcope Enterprises Ltd.
The applications were granted: execution of the trial judgment is stayed pending appeal on terms that Norcope grant security by not encumbering and by perfecting a security interest in specified unencumbered pieces of equipment and by proceeding with the appeal without undue delay, with Yukon entitled to apply to...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2023 YKCA 7
- Parties
- Respondent/plaintiff: Government of Yukon; Appellant/respondent by Cross Appeal (defendant): Norcope Enterprises Ltd.; Respondent/appellant by Cross Appeal (defendant): Intact Insurance Company; Respondent (third Party): Tetra Tech EBA Inc.; Further Third Party (respondent): Norcon Concrete Products Inc.; Further Third Party (respondent): Yucal Properties Inc.; Further Third Party (respondent): Douglas L. Gonder
- Court
- Yukon Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 9 August 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal From Trial Judgment / Chambers Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal and Sealing Order
- Outcome
- Applications for stay of execution and for a sealing order granted with conditions
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Security for Judgment, Apportionment of Liability, Performance Bond, Sealing Order, Irreparable Harm, Balance of Convenience, Onus of Proof, Waiver/warranty Letter, Jurisdiction to Seal
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Government of Yukon
Respondent/plaintiff
Norcope Enterprises Ltd.
Appellant/respondent by Cross Appeal (defendant)
Intact Insurance Company
Respondent/appellant by Cross Appeal (defendant)
Tetra Tech EBA Inc.
Respondent (third Party)
Norcon Concrete Products Inc.
Further Third Party (respondent)
Yucal Properties Inc.
Further Third Party (respondent)
Douglas L. Gonder
Further Third Party (respondent)
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal From Trial Judgment / Chambers Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal and Sealing Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there is a serious issue on appeal with respect to the trial judge's treatment of onus and the waiver/warranty letter
- 2 Whether Norcope would suffer irreparable harm absent a stay
- 3 Whether the balance of convenience favours a stay and what security is appropriate
Ratio Decidendi
The applications were granted: execution of the trial judgment is stayed pending appeal on terms that Norcope grant security by not encumbering and by perfecting a security interest in specified unencumbered pieces of equipment and by proceeding with the appeal without undue delay, with Yukon entitled to apply to vary or set aside the stay if the appeal is not heard by November 2023; the affidavit of D.L. Gonder containing confidential financial information is sealed because disclosure would pose a serious risk to a commercial interest and no reasonable alternatives suffice, subject to limited disclosure to identify the unencumbered equipment.
Court Disposition
Applications for stay of execution and for a sealing order granted with conditions
Orders
- Execution of the trial judgment stayed pending appeal or further order
- Norcope shall not encumber the identified unencumbered pieces of equipment pending disposition of the appeal and shall execute documents reasonably requested by Yukon to perfect the security
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment